It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
First evidence that the universe is not as we know it has emerged from the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the giant atom-smashing machine built to recreate conditions at the dawn of time.
Confirmation of the results, showing minute deviations in the behaviour of a sub-atomic particle, would indicate the existence of a 'new physics' model of the universe.
Until now scientists have relied on the 'Standard Model', a description of the nuts and bolts mechanics of the universe - its particles and forces - that has worked well but contains serious gaps.
For instance, the Standard Model cannot explain phenomena such as dark matter, invisible material that shrouds galaxies and holds them together, or gravity.
phys.org...
The Standard Model, which has given the most complete explanation up to now of the universe, has gaps, and is unable to explain phenomena like dark matter or gravitational interaction between particles. Physicists are therefore seeking a more fundamental theory that they call "New Physics", but up to now there has been no direct proof of its existence, only indirect observation of dark matter, as deduced, among other things, from the movement of the galaxies.
As far as I understand it, it makes sense. If that's the right word.
whats your stance on the big bang theory phage?
I don't think so. I don't see why it would.
and will the gas cloud thats due to hit the black hole in september (i think) shed any light on the big bang theory?
Your concept of what entanglement (I think that's what you're talking about) differs from my understanding of it. But would a photon computer help what?
And would a photon computer help or would that further confuse the situation with the photon being at 2 places at the same time(faster then light?)
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Ta1ntedJustice
As far as I understand it, it makes sense. If that's the right word.
whats your stance on the big bang theory phage?
Originally posted by GalaxyEyes
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Ta1ntedJustice
As far as I understand it, it makes sense. If that's the right word.
whats your stance on the big bang theory phage?
So in that case, you don't understand it.
To be more precise, we do know something about the ~4% baryonic matter. It's the other ~96% made of dark matter and dark energy we don't understand.
Originally posted by filledcup
we obviously do not understand one iota of our universe yet.
String theory isn't all that "new". Physicist Lawrence Krauss made a TED presentation and showed this cartoon to summarize the results of 40 years of string theory:
Evidence For 'New Physics' Means Universe Is Not As We Know It...
For instance, the Standard Model cannot explain phenomena such as dark matter, invisible material that shrouds galaxies and holds them together, or gravity.
The term 'new physics' was coined to describe more fundamental theories that go beyond the Standard Model, some of which involve strange concepts such as tiny vibrating "strings" and extra dimensions.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
String theory isn't all that "new". Physicist Lawrence Krauss made a TED presentation and showed this cartoon to summarize the results of 40 years of string theory:
LQG differs from string theory in that it is formulated in 3 and 4 dimensions and without supersymmetry or Kaluza–Klein theory extra dimensions, while the latter requires both to be true. There is no experimental evidence to date that supports string theory's predictions of supersymmetry and Kaluza–Klein theory extra dimensions. In a 2003 paper A dialog on quantum gravity,[74] Carlo Rovelli regards the fact LQG is formulated in 4 dimensions and without supersymmetry as a strength of the theory as it represents the most parsimonious explanation, consistent with current experimental results, over its rival string/M-theory. Peter Woit in Not Even Wrong and Lee Smolin in The Trouble with Physics also regards string/M-theory to be in conflict with current known experimental results.
Loop Quantum Gravity - Gravitons, string theory, super symmetry, extra dimensions in lqg
Originally posted by filledcup
there is alot that science is currently unable to observe. more reason why we should not put our faith of existence in the hands of science.