It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GalaxyEyes
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Ta1ntedJustice
As far as I understand it, it makes sense. If that's the right word.
whats your stance on the big bang theory phage?
So in that case, you don't understand it.
In a paper posted on the arXiv preprint server1, Christof Wetterich, a theoretical physicist at the University of Heidelberg in Germany, has devised a different cosmology in which the Universe is not expanding but the mass of everything has been increasing. Such an interpretation could help physicists to understand problematic issues such as the so-called singularity present at the Big Bang, he says.
Evidence Against the Expanding Universe Hypothesis Edwin Hubble did not favor the expanding universe hypothesis
For, in his writings Hubble consistently doubted the Doppler shift interpretation, always referring to the galaxy redshifts as “apparent velocities.” Hubble, in fact, favored the tired-light interpretation, the proposal that photons lose energy as they travel through interstellar space, finding that it offered a more reasonable interpretation of the observational data. However, he realized that to adopt this interpretation would require admitting that it was due to “some hitherto unrecognized principle in physics.”
Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by BaronPampa
Experimental Confirmation That The Universe Is Not Expanding, page 1
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by ShaeTheShaman
it must suck being a scientist sometimes. knowing you'll never get answers to the universe. studying your whole life on something to find out in the end you were wrong . smh , this will happen many life times.
Originally posted by EasyPleaseMe
Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by BaronPampa
Experimental Confirmation That The Universe Is Not Expanding, page 1
www.abovetopsecret.com...
That 'paper' was a load of junk, even the OP realised that...
Originally posted by EasyPleaseMe
Originally posted by ShaeTheShaman
it must suck being a scientist sometimes. knowing you'll never get answers to the universe. studying your whole life on something to find out in the end you were wrong . smh , this will happen many life times.
Are you confusing 'scientist' with 'physicist'?
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by EasyPleaseMe
Originally posted by ShaeTheShaman
it must suck being a scientist sometimes. knowing you'll never get answers to the universe. studying your whole life on something to find out in the end you were wrong . smh , this will happen many life times.
Are you confusing 'scientist' with 'physicist'?
The terms are interchangeable since a physicist IS a scientist.
Originally posted by EasyPleaseMe
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by EasyPleaseMe
Originally posted by ShaeTheShaman
it must suck being a scientist sometimes. knowing you'll never get answers to the universe. studying your whole life on something to find out in the end you were wrong . smh , this will happen many life times.
Are you confusing 'scientist' with 'physicist'?
The terms are interchangeable since a physicist IS a scientist.
That's like saying all sportsmen are basketball players
Originally posted by EasyPleaseMe
reply to post by filledcup
When you say science and religion will unite, are you talking about our universe being a simulation and therefor requiring a creator?
A surprising amount of high level theoretical physicists seem to favour the simulation hypothesis but none have mentioned the implications of this.
edit on 4/8/2013 by EasyPleaseMe because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Char-Lee
[
I believe the favored idea is that our own human race created the simulation of their history. Then the implications are clear.
they are slowly approaching my particular field of expertise.. inter-dimensional travel.
Originally posted by EasyPleaseMe
Originally posted by Char-Lee
[
I believe the favored idea is that our own human race created the simulation of their history. Then the implications are clear.
Can you explain more or provide a link?