posted on Apr, 14 2013 @ 12:22 PM
Originally posted by ArMaP
Yes, but what the doctor is supposed to do is to kill the unborn baby, then remove it from the womb, not removing it first and then kill it.
Do you even realize how insane it is to call the first "order of action" a legal abortion and the second "order of action" a murder?
Only in a sick twisted society does a distance of 2 feet or a few mins of time make the determination that a KILLING is considered "legal" or
And make no mistake, EVERY single abortion is a killing, it is the ending of a Life form with its own unique genetic code which requires only TWO
things to remain alive, nutrition and shelter.
In the womb a baby is provided nutrition and shelter in order to survive, out of the womb a baby must be provided with nutrition and shelter in order
to survive. There is NO difference whatsoever in the essential status of a baby in or out of the womb, merely different stages of development and
growth, the markings of a LIVING CREATURE.
And that life will continue to survive until tragedy strikes, until it meets its end due to the hostilities of another life form or the failing of a
major organ due to natural causes.
but many would prefer to stick their heads in the sand and call these precious beautiful children, "a mass of worthless tissue". You might as well
say that a pregnant woman has a tumor growing in her womb until all of a sudden one day that tumor miraculously is considered a baby. One moment a
worthless tumor, the next moment a human life worth protecting and preserving? It is pure insanity to maintain that such a distinction exists, that
once the babies heart beats just that one more time, that it is now a human life with rights in our society, however during all the heart beats before
that moment it was a worthless mass of tissue. Let us not forget that a doctor doesn't have to "KILL" a tumor before removing it from the body.
I pray for our nation, we may come to our senses yet.