Everything You Need to Know So Far About the Gosnell Trial. The media blackout GRAPHIC!

If all you watch for your daily news is from the big 3 networks, CNN, or MSNBC you are probably not familiar with this case that is currently in it trial phase. I guarantee you've probably heard about the Kardashian divorce or the Jodi Arias murder trial. Trust me when I say the Gosnell case is far worse than anything you have ever heard of. Up until just a day or two ago the MSM has been absolutely mum and in the court room several sections of seating were set aside for the press and the area was completely empty. Not a reporter in sight...

The details are horrifying and more gruesome than anything Hollywood could ever produce...

I thought this day would never come. The MSM can no longer pretend they didn’t “hear” about the trial of Dr. Kermit Gosnell (ABC News’ Terry Moran even tweeted last night that the murderer in question “is probably the most successful serial killer in the history of the world”). But still too many networks have failed to report on the details of the case.

That being said, the indispensable pro-life website Life News has compiled a list of the ten most horrific revelations to emerge from the trial -- many of which have gone unreported.

I cannot even begin to fathom how this man was able to get away with this for so long.... and only got caught because they were investigating him for illegally dispensing prescription drugs and controlled narcotics...

WARNING!! GRAPHIC DETAILS

1) A young woman who worked at Kermit Gosnell’s abortion clinic as a teenager testified that she saw a baby’s chest move even after the gruesome snipping procedure Gosnell used to end the baby’s life. “The chest was moving,” she testified. The baby was so large that another worker even took a cellphone picture of it. Prosecution experts, based on the picture, say the baby was well past 24 weeks, the legal limit for abortion in Pennsylvania.

2) Another former employee described how she heard a baby scream during a live-birth abortion. “I can’t describe it. It sounded like a little alien,” he testified, telling a judge and Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas jury that the body of the child was about 18 to 24 inches long and was one of the largest babies she had seen delivered during abortion procedures at Gosnell’s clinic.

3) Stephen Massof, who does not have a medical license, described how he jabbed medical scissors into the backs of babies’ necks to kill them. He assisted Gosnell in “snipping” the spinal cords of babies, calling it, “literally a beheading. It is separating the brain from the body.”

I am going to leave it at that. My point is that everyone needs to know about this case of a Serial murderer. The details are horrendous. Share this story and demand that the MSM gives it the coverage that it deserves. Imagine how many other clinics like this (specializing in late term live birth abortions) exist without scrutiny.

I'll close it with this

Why was this House of Death not inspected for 17 years? Indeed, how could this barbarism possibly have gone on for so long? The answer I’m afraid is all too predictable.

17 years with no inspections. The blind eye was cast... I can only imagine why. The truth hurts and the pro choice bunch has too much to lose...

townhall.com...

The empty Press seats in the court room




townhall.com...

Do the charges in this case list the number of deaths? What are the exact charges? Have the mothers themselves been involved in the case, and will they testify? Thanks.

I'm speechless. This D-Bag deserves an old style of justice...the lynch mob! I saw this story a few days back and why am I not surprised the liberal media is ignoring this? A bunch of D-Bags as well.

Reply to post by jibeho

i think this guy was unlicensed and bribing inspectors


Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

reply to post by Rezlooper


The liberal media is ignoring this because it would go against their beliefs. Admitting that what this man did was wrong or demonizing the procedures would just open up a pandoras box, and they can't have that.

I have a very strong stomach, but just visualizing what was done in that statement made me feel very queasy. I can't imagine someone being able to perform these procedures and still have a clear conscience at the end of the day. Takes a very sick and twisted individual to commit this type of horrific act.

I hope this doctor and all involved get whats coming to them.

www.lifenews.com...

this link gives many more details.

My Stars...that is appalling..it makes me want to vomit. Poor...Poor babies..I almost feel as if the mothers should also be charged. Conspiracy to murder...if the baby was moving and breathing on it's own..then that is very different than a clump of tissue..I have mixed feelings on abortion. I think in very early pregnancy any argument could be made..but that late in a pregnancy..where it's actually moving and breathing..it is just different.

wow, this is crazy, i am pro choice, but NOT pro murder, their is a
limit on how long one can wait to make the decision.

Personally i could not agree to abortion for any reason, its just not
in me, but i believe that in general women and men who they are involved
with deserve the option if early enough, but for me, just couldn't to it.

But this.... this is sad, hope this guy gets what is deserved in the long run,
and its not justice through the system either. It's after he is sentenced to prison
his justice will happen.

Originally posted by Aleister
Do the charges in this case list the number of deaths? What are the exact charges? Have the mothers themselves been involved in the case, and will they testify? Thanks.

From what I could find, he is being accused of 8 deaths, one mother (that, apparently, died of too much anesthesia) and 7 babies that were born alive.

I don't think the mothers are involved, as they did not go to the clinic to have the babies and get them killed after.

Originally posted by ArMaP
I don't think the mothers are involved, as they did not go to the clinic to have the babies and get them killed after.

what do you mean the mothers weren't involved, why else would you go to a abortion clinic and lay up on a table.
and i'm pretty sure most women know how many weeks along they are. and if he aborted the babies with out their consent i think someone would have said something.

Originally posted by hounddoghowlie
what do you mean the mothers weren't involved, why else would you go to a abortion clinic and lay up on a table.

To make an abortion, not to give birth to a living baby.

and i'm pretty sure most women know how many weeks along they are.

Yes, but what the doctor is supposed to do is to kill the unborn baby, then remove it from the womb, not removing it first and then kill it.

and if he aborted the babies with out their consent i think someone would have said something.

The Wikipedia article about the doctor says that there was at least one case in which the abortion was performed after the 15 years old mother saying that she had changed her mind.

Originally posted by severdsoul
wow, this is crazy, i am pro choice, but NOT pro murder, their is a
limit on how long one can wait to make the decision.

Personally i could not agree to abortion for any reason, its just not
in me, but i believe that in general women and men who they are involved
with deserve the option if early enough, but for me, just couldn't to it.

But this.... this is sad, hope this guy gets what is deserved in the long run,
and its not justice through the system either. It's after he is sentenced to prison
his justice will happen.

I absolutely agree. That's exactly how I feel about it as well.

This is beyond horrible. After I read a few of those cases I had to stop and scroll past the rest. I truly felt like I was going to throw up. All I can think of is WHY?

reply to post by jibeho


Bad apple, not enough inspections. No reason to make a blanket change to abortion rights.

This is certainly horrible but it doesn't even put him in the top tier for serial killers.

From what I can see there are less than 10 victims.

Not to make light of what he did but to compare him to someone like Gary Ridgway who had far more victims isn't putting this in the proper context.

Truck painter who confessed to killing 71 women. The United States' most prolific serial killer; also known as The Green River Killer. He almost exclusively targeted escorts from Seattle. Once there, he would proposition a prostitute, drive to the banks of the Green River, and strangle her to death. After murdering his victim he would dump her body near the nearby water. Suspected of killing over 90 victims, confessed to 71, convicted of 49

en.wikipedia.org...

reply to post by Rezlooper


Ahh yes because Lynch mobs are the answer. Gods the OP is an emotive piece, I doubt the subjectivity here.

Originally posted by Hopechest
This is certainly horrible but it doesn't even put him in the top tier for serial killers.

From what I can see there are less than 10 victims.

Not to make light of what he did but to compare him to someone like Gary Ridgway who had far more victims isn't putting this in the proper context.

.............................................
Perhaps you should read the Grand Jury Report before making a statement like this.

This utterly despicable excuse for a human being had been operating his Chamber of Horrors since 1979 and is suspected of killing HUNDREDS of fetuses and live born infants.

He routinely kept infant body parts in jars, plastic garbage bags and freezers there inside the "clinic". That is what alerted the police to the fact that there was some truly horrific things going on there.

He is only being charged on those 10 counts because he routinely destroyed all of his files so there is no paper trail evidence. Please if you really want to know about a true psychopathic serial killer read the Grand Jury Report.

edit on 05/28/2012 by Octave because: tried to fix the quote

Originally posted by ArMaP
Yes, but what the doctor is supposed to do is to kill the unborn baby, then remove it from the womb, not removing it first and then kill it.

Why is one of those okay, and the other is not? Out of sight, out of mind?

I find it repugnant that the only reason he's in trouble is because he got the order wrong.

reply to post by Octave


Hope chest will not read any
more of the articles.
she has made up her mind.

Originally posted by adjensen
Why is one of those okay, and the other is not? Out of sight, out of mind?

I guess it depends on the definition of "person". Apparently, in the US, the moment you are born you are considered a person, so being killed after being born is a homicide, before is something else.

I find it repugnant that the only reason he's in trouble is because he got the order wrong.

Apparently, the law makers think that the order is important.