It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
So if Peter is elected, that means god's will has been completed? Do you think it's at all possible that they are fully intending to fulfill the prophecy?
Also, Peter the Roman wasn't part of Malachy's list originally, it was added in at a later date.edit on 12-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
The Prophecy of the Popes, attributed to St Malachy, is a list of 112 short phrases in Latin. They purport to describe each of the Roman Catholic popes (along with a few anti-popes), beginning with Pope Celestine II (elected in 1143) and concluding with a later added pope described in the prophecy as "Peter the Roman", whose pontificate will end in the destruction of the seven hilled city.
The prophecy was first published in 1595 by Arnold de Wyon, a Benedictine historian, as part of his book "Lignum Vitæ" (Tree of Life). However, in the 1820 printed version of Malachy's prophesies, Lignum Vitæ , a 112th pope appears that was not in Malachy's original manuscript. The 112th pope was added by the Olivetan monks. The Order of St. Benedict claims this final pope will come within the Benedictine Order, and that he was placed in the secession line because St. Benedict himself prophesied that before the end of the world, his Order will triumphantly lead the Catholic Church in its battle against evil (the Battle of Armageddon).
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Where did you hear that Hermes is actually Enoch?
He was a messenger of the gods, but he was also the protector of thieves and poets. You're ignoring that fact. Why not call him Enoch instead of Hermes? That would have made more sense since the OT and the prophets were huge in those days.
Yes I read the verse, that is the one that I was referring to to start with.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
So you're telling me that no one for the past 2,000 years had any idea what that meant? You're painting with a mighty broad stroke my friend. If you could figure it out (I assume that was all your own research) then I'm sure SOMEONE would have figured it out between then and now.
So Jesus calls Peter Satan RIGHT AFTER calling him the rock, and then goes on to say that he is being tempted by Satan at the last supper... yet Judas ends up betraying him? That's a little bit weird if you ask me. Why would Jesus keep on hinting that Peter was Satan and even say Satan was tempting him only to turn around a few seconds later and choose Judas as the one possessed by Satan?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Also, how does Israel forcefully taking over a country = ending captivity? The reason Israel is allowed to do this without hindrance is because everyone is scared to do anything about it. They know if they try to stop Israel, they'll have the U.S. military to answer to.
If they survive their hostile takeover, it's because of OUR army and THEIR money, not god's will.edit on 12-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
ETA: Sure David's DNA can be tracked through history, because we have a piece of hair from everyone who ever descended from David up until today right?
Also, who are the descendants of David who are living today? It wouldn't surprise me if they were some of the most powerful and rich people on Earth, that is IF they are known as you imply.edit on 12-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
How are they toppling themselves exactly? This is what they want, this has been their plan for a loooong time. They already have their money stored away and their connections made, so how are they hurting themselves if they are doing it purposefully?
Was it also god's plan for millions of people to be massacred and tortured in countless wars throughout history? Or was that man's doing?edit on 12-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
I AM a 4D entity, and so are you and so is everyone else, our spirits are the 4D entities (I use plural but we are all One, THE god).
We cast the image/shadow from our perspective and we ("I Am") are the 4D entity that is in multiple places at once. I am a 4D entity and I DO appear to you as a 3D object from your perspective. Yet, I see in the same dimension as you do.
My 4D being does penetrate through everything. Dig a hole in the ground, there is Earth ALL the way through to the other side. No matter how far you dig, your shadow will always bring forth 3D Earth. Hopefully that makes sense
As you put it, Christ (consciousness) is one loaf and we are slices of that loaf. Consciousness (Christ) comprises of the whole of the loaf, so each slice is still part of that whole. Jesus' last name was not Christ, that is only a title given to him after he died. Not once did he ever call himself Christ. He understood that we are all One (God), and that was the good news he was spreading, not the watered down, butchered version Paul put forth.
There is no need to believe in Jesus in order to have eternal life, everyONE has it by default.
John 1
1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.