It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Care to address anything else besides that one line of text?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
In reference to John 21.
John 21
Jesus said, “Feed my sheep. 18 Very truly I tell you, when you were younger you dressed yourself and went where you wanted; but when you are old you will stretch out your hands, and someone else will dress you and lead you where you do not want to go.” 19 Jesus said this to indicate the kind of death by which Peter would glorify God. Then he said to him, “Follow me!”
So someone would eventually lead Peter by the hand?
Acts 22
10 “‘What shall I do, Lord?’ I asked.
“ ‘Get up,’ the Lord said, ‘and go into Damascus. There you will be told all that you have been assigned to do.’ 11 My companions led me by the hand into Damascus, because the brilliance of the light had blinded me.
So Jesus says that when Peter is older he will stretch his hand out and be led somewhere. Paul was led by hand to Damascus. Coincidence?
edit on 11-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
Matthew 7
18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by undo
My interpretation of what baptism symbolizes is child birth. Jesus said that in order to be "born again" you had to be born on water and spirit. What happens right before a woman gives birth? Her water breaks.
The water gate you mentioned symbolizes the vagina, the "gate" through which everyone enters this world. What Jesus meant by being "born again" to reach heaven is that we must reincarnate off of this planet, which is hell (within heaven), onto another planet.
I also don't believe that John actually "baptized" Jesus, but that Mary was giving birth to her son and her husband John the Baptist helped to submerge her into the water. Water births are said to make childbirth easier on both the mother and child, so it makes sense to me.
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by Akragon
I'd rather hear about the holes in my theory from someone who isn't biased on the issue. Point them out please.
Don't take this as me saying you're wrong, because that's not what I'm saying. I'm genuinely curious about your take on it.edit on 11-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by undo
Though I appreciate your replies, I'm not sure how anything you've said so far has anything to do with the topic. Maybe I'm being dense?
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
Paul was not a good tree. He zealously persecuted Jesus' earliest followers.
Matthew 7
18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit.
At the time of Paul's "conversion" he was the most rotten tree of all. So that begs the question, why would Jesus contradict himself and choose a bad tree to bear his (good) fruit? It doesn't make any sense whatsoever. What you're doing is completely ignoring Paul's life before his conversion, assuming it is irrelevant. Well, it's not.
Isn't it more likely that Paul intended to change Jesus' message from the beginning? And change it he did! Take a look at this site. It lists numerous incidents where Paul completely contradicts Jesus' message. Though I'm sure you'll have an apology for every single one.
edit on 11-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 3NL1GHT3N3D1
reply to post by EnochWasRight
So you completely deny the idea that the prophecy of the popes is self-fulfilling? I'm certain that the Catholic Church has heard of Peter the Roman and what he brings with him, so why would they STILL elect a man named Peter as Pope unless they were trying to fulfill it?
The ONLY reason they would go ahead and elect him was if they were intentionally fulfilling prophecy and trying to bring about the end of the world. Unless of course they've been living under a rock.edit on 11-2-2013 by 3NL1GHT3N3D1 because: (no reason given)