It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Krazysh0t
Why do these discussions always concern being atheist or Christian? I'm agnostic. I don't disbelieve in God, but I certainly don't believe in him either. Basically it boils down to evidence for me. There are too many inconsistencies in the bible (like how the OT God and the NT God are so different in character that they are practically different "gods" if you will) and not to mention, many of its stories can be traced back to stories and myths from other, earlier religions. That being said, the bible is a book written and edited by man and if God does exist and evidence surfaces indicating as such, I would be more than willing to open up my beliefs to Him.
Sorry rant over, I just hate how my mindset is always left out of this discussion and you are either for or against His existence.edit on 9-2-2013 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by Seektruthalways1
I am not aware of other religions that support evolution with their own doctrine, but yes there is Catholic sects that do use that. Its just a compromising group of believers who don't want to truly stand up for the Word, but cower and give in to big groups like evolution speaking people.
What is so frustrating is that I'm sure evolution can be proven in a lab. There are bugs that live only a day, so they have to quickly mate in order to pass on their genes to the next generation. I don't know what they are, so I'll use a common housefly as an example. Flies squirt liquid out of their proboscis to liquify what they eat. If that food source (say sugar) is under a plastic shelf with tiny holes in it the fly would have to stick its proboscis through these holes. But, what if the shelf is raised just a little from time to time? Would the proboscis on these flies grow longer and longer with each generation in order to get at the sugar? I think it would. Ergo, evolution. Or, some flies would die out from having too short of a proboscis, leaving the better equipped flies to mate and pass on their genes. That is still evolution, and I think these changes can occur within a very short amount of time for us to actually see the changes.
Originally posted by BillKumarbi
reply to post by alfa1
The solution to the whole subject is very easy, I would advise all those concerned to obtain the book "Slave Species of the Gods ". The secret history of the Anunnaki and their mission on earth. By Michael Tellinger. This explains ALL you need to know. In my opinion , and founded on my experience as a Christian Minister and Counsellor for many years . I would recommend it should be taught as compulsory reading in schools to replace that which is considered religious !
Originally posted by BillKumarbi
reply to post by alfa1
The solution to the whole subject is very easy, I would advise all those concerned to obtain the book "Slave Species of the Gods ". The secret history of the Anunnaki and their mission on earth. By Michael Tellinger. This explains ALL you need to know. In my opinion , and founded on my experience as a Christian Minister and Counsellor for many years . I would recommend it should be taught as compulsory reading in schools to replace that which is considered religious !
I believe in god and I also don't - not contradictory, because I can't sit here and tell you about something I have no proof of, this would be illogical
Originally posted by Kapablanka
reply to post by Juran
Incorrect my friend, I tuned in to what lies between the lines you write before I even read the second half which, to my dismay, you stated you had wasted your time on. so thanks for sharing your wisdom with me, it crept through your post anyways, the only people wasting time are those than have no understanding.
Originally posted by Shema
I want to emphasize the stark stupidity of the never-ending bickering that the two sides engage in. Of course the two actually compliment each other, creation and evolution. and I fully believe that eventually this will have to admitted by both . It is the atheists who should concede ground and admit that creation is highly probable according to all the known facts and they can do it without having to denounce evolution. But for some reason they refuse to bend. I suppose its a collective pride thing, I don't really know.
Originally posted by pacifier2012
You are what you believe you are.
reply to post by DestroyDestroyDestroy
Text If you look into Darwin's findings in the Galapagos, he observed that birds who live on fruit bearing islands had beaks suited for eating fruit. Birds who lived on other islands, whose diet consisted of insects, had sharper beaks well suited for catching said insects.
Originally posted by Seede
Reading your comment makes me wonder just how your Mr. Darwin can prove your observations. I can't prove Darwin theology wrong but then as the one who has made that claim I wonder if he were alive could he prove that observation?
You see Mr. Destroy that the atheist will always cry that the God believers prove their claim of having a God. Actually that's all i am asking you to do. How do you or Darwin know those birds evolved into fruit or insect hunters. Maybe they just simply packed up and moved. You do realize that even butterflies travel hundreds of mile on air currents as supported by the scientific field and just today I read that hundreds of spiders are raining down in Brazil. So is it possible that birds migrate can to suite their ability?