It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
true but reincarnation does allow to delay making ammends and reforms, "whats the hurry" and what i believe is that if a belief doesnt influence behaviour and actions then its not a belief just an interesting hobby. And reincarnation actually when put in behaviour encourages passiveness!!
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by logical7
What are the lessons that need to be learned? And are they same for each?
How to know them now?
The lessons involve having every possible experience that advances our "soul" to understanding the Divine.
true but reincarnation does allow to delay making ammends and reforms, "whats the hurry" and what i believe is that if a belief doesnt influence behaviour and actions then its not a belief just an interesting hobby.
And reincarnation actually when put in behaviour encourages passiveness!!
Originally posted by Akragon
Honestly who needs to dig through scripture to find proof... Jesus said it specifically....
He says.... IF you can receive it.... meaning IF you haven't been taught otherwise, or even IF you arn't blinded by teachers of men.... John IS Elijah.... and follows it up with the statement ..."He that hath ears to hear, let him hear"
So why can't you hear what hes saying?
Put your religion aside for a second and imagine reading that verse without having any influence from outside sources....
There's only one way to understand it without your religion fogging up your glasses
By the way, whenever you read the words "he that hath ears to hear, let him hear", this means that Jesus is speaking in parables and that the meaning of his words are hidden and not obvious by the way they are spoken. When Jesus said, "this is Elias", he's saying not to take it literally, but to understand it's spiritual meaning.
Originally posted by wildtimes
reply to post by adjensen
adjensen,
I am truly sorry for your pain.
Would you like to hear "answers", though? Or do you prefer to be 'miserable' and not try to find some solace?
She died because she had a bad heart, not because "God needed her" (as I heard from some people at her wake) or because she needed to learn what it was like to die in the prime of life, and I needed to learn that, no matter how bad one can feel, there's always something that can make it worse.
There is no lesson in traumatic grief.
And like I've said, without accumulated knowledge, any advancement is incidental, and therefore irrelevant.
Names? No, apart from Valentinus.
Haven't you read Lost Christianities by Bart Ehrman? I thought that you had.
According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, Origen believed in the pre-existence of the soul, but by the Fifth Ecumenical Council (Constantinople II) the notion was discarded.
As I said, I have no real opinion on the matter, and as you well know, as a Catholic, I'm pretty Protestant in my views, lol. Just because the Catechism says something doesn't mean I'm on board with it.
I read one of her books, on the afterlife, and it was horrid. She basically presented the afterlife as she would like it to be, everything was in accordance with her own life experience -- the "entrance" to heaven was in southern California, for Pete's sakes.
Originally posted by logical7
reply to post by Akragon
Do you believe starving children choose their existence? Obviously not.... but either God is a cruel bastard (like the OT shows) or these people have been given what they've created... Even as it says in the bible... you get what you give and the world is messed up and has been since it started... Its the only logical way
you means starving children deserve what they get? That doesnt feel good.
So in a way making someone suffer in hell is cruel of God but suffering here birth after birth is ok as "you get what you give"!!!
Originally posted by octotom
reply to post by Akragon
Clearly the chapter is about Christ dying only once. In making that point though the author of the letter to the Hebrews likens Christ dying once to men dying once. Thus the notion of reincarnation is denied.
I just had the thought that it's pretty interesting as well that Paul, in writing to the Thessalonians, who thought that Christ had already come, says that when Christ comes, the dead in Christ will rise first. He makes no mention of anyone being reincarnated. Which makes sense because, if someone reincarnates, it would be possible for them to no longer be one that is dead in Christ.
So, in essence, the "manner of spirit" in which John was supposed to work was different from the manner of spirit in which Elijah was sent to work.