It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by burnett662
OK so I've been at work all day and haven't had a chance to keep up with the changing news. I was able to read a little news and listen to reports on the radio at lunch time. At that time the reports were saying it was a disgruntled father who was using 2 9mm hand guns and they were searching for a second killer.
Now I'm home and checking out the reports that are saying it was a teachers son using a .223, probably an AR-15. Then the dad was dead and now he's alive. I'm sure there are numerous more inconsistencies from early reports to what they are saying now. Very suspicious to me but for what its worth my heart goes out to these families and I will hug my children extra tight tonight as I'm sure many of you will too.edit on 14-12-2012 by burnett662 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by burnett662
OK so I've been at work all day and haven't had a chance to keep up with the changing news. I was able to read a little news and listen to reports on the radio at lunch time. At that time the reports were saying it was a disgruntled father who was using 2 9mm hand guns and they were searching for a second killer.
Now I'm home and checking out the reports that are saying it was a teachers son using a .223, probably an AR-15. Then the dad was dead and now he's alive. I'm sure there are numerous more inconsistencies from early reports to what they are saying now. Very suspicious to me but for what its worth my heart goes out to these families and I will hug my children extra tight tonight as I'm sure many of you will too.edit on 14-12-2012 by burnett662 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Majic
ENOUGH
For anyone who missed it, please read this post and admin note:
More Than a Dozen Killed, Including Children, at Connecticut Elementary School Shooting
There is still a great deal we don't know about this mass murder. What we do know is a bunch of stale pro/anti-gun rhetoric that has nothing to do with the actual massacre won't reveal any facts, and only serves to drive this discussion off topic.
Yes, politicians are already capitalizing on this to promote their agendas. There are many other news articles about that and they are suited for other threads in our political forums. By all means, anyone who just can't resist spouting off about politics in the face of cold-blooded mass murder are free to go there and scratch that itch.
Let's please stay on the actual shooting in this thread. That's the topic. Digressions from it are not welcome.
Thanks.
reply to post by Nola213
As far as the UK goes, you all do enough damage without guns. Seems everytime I turn on the tv, Another bunch of hooligans is burning down a football stadium and starting riots resulting in multiple deaths.
Originally posted by NarrowGate
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
IDK if it is NWO BUT LISTEN!!!
WE CAN NOT LET THE POLITICIANS DECIDE THIS FOR US!!
We need a nation wide majority vote on a plan of action. Do not let these foolish self-serving people make the decision for us! They almost never get it right and for obvious reasons. This is way to important.
Remember: UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is a global plan that is implemented locally. Over 600 cities in the U.S. are members; our town joined in 2007. The costs are paid by taxpayers.
Considering its policies are woven into all the General Plans of the cities and counties, it's important for people to know where these policies are coming from. While many people support the United Nations for its 'peacemaking' efforts, hardly anyone knows that they have very specific land use policies that they would like to see implemented in every city, county, state and nation. The specific plan is called United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, which has its basis in Communitarianism. By now, most Americans have heard of sustainable development but are largely unaware of Agenda 21.
In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners. It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control. Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body. Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation. Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.