Well you of course avoided those hard questions . You are a shifty shyster when it comes to debating .
Again you did not address Ezekiel 39 . Jesus did not save Israel so your timing is definately wrong. Ezekiel 37 and 38 is then relating to the latter times meaning now .
There in lies a defect in your thinking about the timing of Jesus returning. There is a 1,000 year reign then Armageddon . Then the world is destroyed . At most a time of 1007 years for those events . 1980 years have passed since the time you have accepted as the Tribulation . So for almost 1000 years the world has gone on beyond that time you state as the end times . That does not compute . Then in Matthew Jesus gives us the parable of the Fig Tree . That parable is about Israel becoming a nation again after being spread all over the world . Israel was an occupied nation at the time of Jesus and shortly after would be scattered through out the world . Isreal was not saved . Jesus did not come again at any time up to now . You have discarded every thing not confirming your point .

2nd Thessolonians chapter 2 explains that the harvest or Gathering to gether to the Lord will not happen by any means before the Son of Perdition is revealed by sitting in the Temple and showing himself as he were God .This is where the Temple is rebuilt . The Jews are making ready to do so as we speak .
A time stamp on the destruction of Israel where by Israel pours out a plague onthose that comes against it in in Zechariah 14 verse 12 . The Atomic Bomb is the only thing that replicates the effects of that plague . Another Time Stamp is the Mark of the Beast system that is world wide with a single person or entity in power to control the world and issue that electric money . Any hand held money could be exchanged at any time and uncontrolable by the AC . The technology of today facilitates that Beast System . Those two items logically disproves the preterist belief of a first century tribulation .

That 3rd Temple will have animal sacrifice just as before because the Jews do not accept Jesus as the Christ and recognize only the Law .
After the Abomination that Maketh Desolate occurs the Antichrist will be rebuked for presenting himself as God . In his fury he seeks to completely destroy Israel and they call on Jesus and in Ezekiel 39 Jesus tells how he will deal with the enemies of Israel and saves them .
Now Temple is no longer relevant as it has served it's purpose .

OP-First, I'd like to commend you on bringing up a very valid point and continuing to hammer it home.

Having said that, let me ask you a couple of questions.

Why is it so important to you that Jesus wasn't God and that he didn't die? I mean, what does it matter, at the end of the day? How will believing that affect your life, and how do you think it will affect anyone else's life? I'm not saying that this is an answer to your challenge; I'm just curious as to why this seems so vitally important to you. You want to stop people from worshiping Jesus and believing he died for their sins...and then what? What's that going to do for them? For you?

Do you think that you are the first person to find these verses and point out what seems to be a pretty obvious error? In 2,000 years, no one has ever looked at these verses and drawn the same conclusions as you? That's pretty heady stuff. I mean, all the millions of people who have read the Bible and no one picked up on that? Well, of course they did. And no one tried to change or suppress it, the way that LDS does with the book of Mormon? I mean, that's a pretty serious liability right there out in the open. I grant you that there are some dumb people who read the Bible, but not all of them are morons. Enough people would have pointed this out and made such a fuss that it would have been changed, or the whole religion would have collapsed by now.

So we're left with the conclusion that these verses must not literally mean what you think they mean. Now, you object to people explaining Bible verses by using other ones and to people providing different definitions for terms like "death," but I'm sorry to tell you that those are two of the three ways that people interpret the Bible. The Bible has its own internal logic.

The Bible is not "user-friendly." It is not laid out like an instruction manual or a road map, despite being marketed by Christians like that. It requires digging, and reflection. It's also not like a dictionary, where you can just open it up and have answers clearly spelled out for you. Words change meaning over time, through different cultures and languages, and they require context for interpretation.

The Bible says that the wages of sin is death. Christians teach that the wage of sin is Hell. Now, either you have a contradiction, or you have to try to figure out what the Bible writer meant by "death." You cannot apply the modern meaning to the word and take it at literal face value. If I were to say to you, "You should check out the latest comedy video by Louis C.K.. Dude, I died laughing, " and you were to say, "You're not dead; you just contradicted yourself," it would be absurd. This seems like a silly example, because we both know what I mean by "died," but imagine if someone wrote the conversation down and then translated it to another language twenty centuries from now.

The third way that Christians interpret scripture is by oral tradition. Even the Bible admits that oral teaching is as good as or superior to the written word. 2nd Thess. 2:15 puts oral tradition on par with Paul’s letters, and 2 John 12 shows that the disciples preferred face-to-face teaching over the written word. So, who still has oral tradition? Find that out.

The early church fathers grappled with these questions in the three centuries after Christ, and from this debate came the Nicene Creed and what books are in the Bible. If Hebrews contradicted the death and divinity of Christ, they would have pulled it instead of canonizing it. Read the early church fathers if you are serious about getting an answer to your questions.