It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by phroziac
First of all, the area of the pentagon hit had records on where billions of dollars of missing money was spent.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
flight 93 was headed fo the white house
the pilots were very raw and needed targets they could see easily and recognize and were symbols of american culture and power
like the pentagon
And yet this flimsy building was enough to completely disintegrate an entire aircraft and two 6 tone engines to the point that nothing was left of them? Riiiight! And there was no damage to the walls on either side of this whole, like where did the wings hit? Not even a broken pane of glass? Riiiiight
A reasonably forceful blast from any close point along the Pentagon's surrounding network of public roads would create broad personnel risk inside the outermost of the building's five concentric office rings and could cause severe property and structural damage as well. According to Evey, "The Renovation Office recognized this shortcoming and was determined to address it effectively by incorporating improved personnel safety features into the overall renovation program." The blast protection task was included in the new design work for the first of the Pentagon's five "wedges" and is now a "template" for the follow-on renovation of the other sections.
Eventually, all of the nearly 8,000 windows in the Pentagon will be replaced with fixed double-pane glass mirroring the original architecture but offering improved thermal and ultraviolet filtering properties. However, the new exterior outermost E-Ring windows facing the perimeter roadways and the innermost A-Ring windows (at the courtyard center of the complex), being the most vulnerable, will be blast resistant. The new windows are an insulated, laminated, fully-tempered assembly that is designed to absorb and resist the blast loads without shattering into small projectiles or leaving the frame as a single unit. This design meets the client criteria for translucency and energy efficiency, as well as for safety in a blast event.
Ah, the plane in pa was clearly headed to building 7
Originally posted by hanyak69
reply to post by hanyak69
This is the video of Rumsfeld the day before the attacks
So the missing money and his speech are no longer questioned.
Originally posted by babybunnies
One of the planes WAS heading for the White House, according to the "official report".
White House wouldn't really have made sense though, flying one into The Capitol would have made a much broader statement.
Originally posted by CthulhuMythos
reply to post by elitegamer23
Perhaps because,only weeks before, the Pentagon had gone through extensive beefing up on that one section to make it blast proof with extra thick concrete etc and their records department moved into that very section (think it used to be Rumsfeld's office). Lo and behold, just as they are about to get haulled over the coals for not being able to show where 2.3 Trillion dollars went, their records department gets struck by a hijacked 'plane'. Also luckily it must have destroyed all their 'black ops' dirty dealings too. Who would have thought, eh?
Originally posted by hanyak69
The pentagon walls do some research that is independant of tptb propaganda. And watch the Rumsfeld video before you look stupid uh oh too late for that,
Both engines were found inside the pentagon ???? How did they get there? On the airplane how far apart are they mounted from each other? Makes no sense on how they went in the small opening that was created by the bunker buster missile.