It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DeadSeraph
What I'd like to know is why the countless missile batteries that guard the airspace over the Pentagon didn't seem to notice the airliner headed right for the building.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
flight 93 was headed fo the white house
the pilots were very raw and needed targets they could see easily and recognize and were symbols of american culture and power
like the pentagon
Originally posted by DeadSeraph
reply to post by elitegamer23
The official story is that the Plane that crashed over Pennsylvania was headed for the White House. What I'd like to know is why the countless missile batteries that guard the airspace over the Pentagon didn't seem to notice the airliner headed right for the building.
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
reply to post by spoor
Oh wait, here's my official tourist map of all military air defense installations.
Pick yours up at 7-11 like I did.
Originally posted by ladyteeny
if they could get the pentagon and the twin towers, they could've got the white house.
any "terrorists" with the capability to destroy the WTC and a side of the pentagon would undoubtedly have thought about the white house as a legitimate target. the fact that "terrorists" didn't get the white house makes me wonder exactly who the 'terrorists' are. terrorists would know that bringing the white house down would severely damage the american morale, and therefore make it a prime target.
but of course, bush didn't really want to have his home ruined did he.
Originally posted by ladyteeny
if they could get the pentagon and the twin towers, they could've got the white house.
any "terrorists" with the capability to destroy the WTC and a side of the pentagon would undoubtedly have thought about the white house as a legitimate target. the fact that "terrorists" didn't get the white house makes me wonder exactly who the 'terrorists' are. terrorists would know that bringing the white house down would severely damage the american morale, and therefore make it a prime target.
but of course, bush didn't really want to have his home ruined did he.
Originally posted by elitegamer23
and both your reasons make it seem fishy to me that the pentagon was hit and not the white house.
just imagine the affect it would have had on the usa if the whitehouse was destroyed totally .
for all the time and effort put into these attacks , u think someone at al qaeda would have raised his hand and said lets nail the white house.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
flight 93 was headed fo the white house
the pilots were very raw and needed targets they could see easily and recognize and were symbols of american culture and power
like the pentagon
the white house is just as big a target militarily as the pentagon imo, because the leader of the whole usa military lives there.
in their briefings you would think they would b trained to find the washington monument. it wouldnt even matter which direction you entered DC, u would see this landmark and heading towards it would lead u to the whitehouse.
edit on 8-9-2012 by elitegamer23 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by thesmokingman
reply to post by syrinx high priest
If terrorist were really behind this and wanted to do the most damage, they would have aimed their planes for high traffic areas such as the streets of NY. Many more would have died. The towers were destroyed because they had just been insured 1 month prior to the attacks by larry silverstein for 3.8 billion. He made money by lending his towers for destruction, in one of the biggest insurance frauds of all time.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
93
was
headed
for
the
whitehouse
k?
globalfire.tv...
Larry Silverstein, despite not being the owner of the buildings, was the sole beneficiary of the insurance indemnity payments of more than 7 billion Dollars. Good for Larry that he had not forgotten to increase the insurance policies, just in time, when he signed the lease three months before the catastrophe happened: "Larry Silverstein, since July landlord of the towers, demands from the insurers 7,2 billion Dollars compensation, his speaker, Steve Solomon, said. ... The Port Authorities of New York and New Jersey, owners of the WTC, agree with Silverstein's demand." --Die Welt, Berlin, Oct 10, 2001.