Nessie hunter snaps 'monster' after 26 year wait, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 29 times
Topic started on 3-8-2012 @ 02:05 PM by loam






Nessie hunter snaps 'monster' after 26 year wait

'Nessie' hunter George Edwards waited 26 years for this moment – and he now believes he has the best picture ever taken of the Loch Ness monster.

He spends his life on the loch – around 60 hours a week - taking tourists out on his boat, Nessie Hunter IV, and has led numerous Nessie hunts over the years.

...

"It was slowly moving up the loch towards Urquhart Castle and it was a dark grey colour. It was quite a fair way from the boat, probably about half a mile away but it’s difficult to tell in water.”

After watching the object for five to ten minutes, Mr Edwards said it slowly sank below the surface and never resurfaced."



The article continues:



Before releasing it publicly he sent it to the USA for analysis, though he can’t reveal further details.

“I did not want to mention my sighting until I was sure that I had not photographed a log or something inanimate in the water in the water,” he said. “I have friends in the USA who have friends in the military.

“They had my photo analysed and they have no doubt that I photographed an animate object in the water. I was really excited as I am sure that some strange creatures are lurking in the depths of Loch Ness.”



I like that it appears he made an effort to authenticate the photo. Of course, it is not clear just how yet or to what avail.

It will be interesting to see what others make of this.

edit on 3-8-2012 by loam because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:11 PM by Hudson69
reply to post by loam



26 years for that lousy photo....what a waste of a life


reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:13 PM by Human_Alien
Originally posted by Hudson69
reply to
post by loam



26 years for that lousy photo....what a waste of a life



If this was his passion and/or mission, I think it paid off handsomely and he must feel vindicated (even if it does turn out to be a floating log )


reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:13 PM by Destinyone
reply to post by loam



This goes to prove. Good things come, to those who wait.

Cool story and pics.....

Des


reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:13 PM by isyeye
reply to post by loam



The problem I have with the picture is scale. It's very hard to make out the size of the object...but judging by how still the water looks, and the size of the ripples around it, I don't think it is the Loch Ness Monster. It's just doesn't seem to match the scale of what we would expect to see.

I know it's only a part of the object in the picture, but it just still doesn't seem big enough...What is shown doesn't seem to be very wide.
edit on 3-8-2012 by isyeye because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:15 PM by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by Hudson69
reply to
post by loam



26 years for that lousy photo....what a waste of a life


Takes some real arrogance to say what another person should consider worthwhile to dedicate their life to.


reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:17 PM by loam
reply to post by isyeye



I'm guessing from what is shown, 5-7 feet(ish).

Not very large. I agree.

That's the problem with these photos of "Nessie". They never are very definitive.
edit on 3-8-2012 by loam because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:17 PM by isyeye
reply to post by TheGreatDivider



I have to admit...anything is possible.

My gut tells me it's not the Loch Ness Monster though.



reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:19 PM by WonOunce
reply to post by loam



The object in the photo seems like it is a lot closer than half a mile away.


reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:21 PM by isyeye
reply to post by loam



I was guessing the length to be close to 5 feet as well. I've spent alot of time on the water over the years, and probably could have taken hundreds of pictures of objects that could be mistaken for a creature.

The other question I have is where are the rest of the pictures? I would have been snapping them like a madman. If there was a sequence of pictures showing movement, it would at least give it a little more of a possibility.
edit on 3-8-2012 by isyeye because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:22 PM by normajean
reply to post by loam



I have to say what a great picture! I think it is the first one I have seen of Nessie that wasn't blurry or grainy.
That gentleman sure has stamina doesn't he? Twenty-six years in the making.


reply posted on 3-8-2012 @ 02:25 PM by Blue Shift
Originally posted by isyeye
reply to
post by loam



The problem I have with the picture is scale. It's very hard to make out the size of the object...but judging by how still the water looks, and the size of the ripples around it, I don't think it is the Loch Ness Monster. It's just doesn't seem to match the scale of what we would expect to see.

I know it's only a part of the object in the picture, but it just still doesn't seem big enough...What is shown seems too "narrow".

It's the same problem with the "Surgeon's" Photo:



Unless the guy was taking photos from a hot air balloon, it's too close and small to be called a monster, and therefore could really be anything.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



ohio bigfoot carrying a stick
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags
FB - Find Bigfoot announcement: "HUGE" new video coming Sept 10
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags
Huge, Hairy Giant Reported by Trio, Reviving Legend
  Posted 9 days ago with 7 member flags
Actual Bigfoot Footage!!??!!
  Posted 4 days ago with 4 member flags
"Sasquatch" They are real! Are they really here?
  Posted 16 days ago with 3 member flags
Rocky Mountains Sasquatch photo
  Posted 9 days ago with 3 member flags
The Texas Blue Dog
  Posted 8 days ago with 3 member flags
GIANT worm found in China
  Posted 5 days ago with 3 member flags