It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
reply to post by neo96
Keep waiting since that is not the topic Iran and their war machine is.
Isreal via hamas and hezzbollah and The US while in Iraq
You really think in the past 100 years USA only intervened in Iraq? LMAO
False, you keep diverting the topic again.
It is very relevant to the topic because the USA is leading the charge on Iran to not develop nuclear weapons.
You say they are a warmonger, and now I am gonna keep asking you who is the actual warmonger:
How many countries has the USA attacked in the past 100 years vs Irans military interventions.
Answer the question instead of diverting. Just because it is easy to attack a country does not mean we should.
What does that make the USA? A bully
Answer the question. I will repeat it again. How many countries has the USA attacked in the past 100 years
Just because it is not a theocracy does not mean religious influence.
Secondly money of defense contractors and corporations are the religion of the USA, it is what drives the government
LMAO, and now we go and attack my citizenship..whats next, your mamma jokes..
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Just as soon as they stop funding and supporting certain groups that attack other countries and their interests.
Indeed and:
www.presstv.ir...
NATO did Libya...
The US and a coalition did Iraq.
The majority of Iran's neighbors don't want them to have Nukes. If Iran so much as farts wrong they'll know how General Custer felt.
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Just as soon as they stop funding and supporting certain groups that attack other countries and their interests.
Indeed and:
www.presstv.ir...
NO…I said Iran wasn’t capable of victory, hence the reason for isolation.
It makes the US a superpower able and willing to do what it takes to preserve the US of A and anyone lucky enough to be considered our ally.
I will answer again….as many as needed!
Religious influence and religious RULE are two different things; though it might not fit your agenda.
That’s not my religion…I’m Christian…thanks!
I was serious!
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Iran fears US invasion as the US has a history of attacking middle eastern countries
Iran does not have a history of warmongery over the past 200 years like the USA
It makes the USA a bully. Going and attackign small countries that have no threat to the USA does not make it a superpower
If I shot you with a tank while you only have a 9 mm does that make me a super badass superpower? No.
As many as needed? So you think we should just go around and kill people for no reason just because we can?
Very similar. Influence has a lot ot do with US politics
1. Then why in the 34+ past years hasn't the US taken Iran out?
2. Why wait until they get nukes to take out Iran?
3. Why hasn't the US taken Iran out over a good deal of evidence of their covert activities all around the region?
4. Why hasn't the US taken Iran out for their funding of groups who fought and killed US service men in Iraq?
If the US really wanted Iran gone it would have done so a long time ago or at least as recently as 9/11.
That doesn’t change their violation of the NPT (violation of trust with the international community).
Your opinion…definitely not fact.
A person who uses strength or power to harm or intimidate those who are weaker.
Use superior strength or influence to intimidate (someone), typically to force him or her to do what one wants.
Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight.
No…as many as needed to secure the prosperity of US citizens and citizens of allied countries.
Very similar. Influence has a lot ot do with US politics Your opinion….definitely not fact.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
4. Why hasn't the US taken Iran out for their funding of groups who fought and killed US service men in Iraq?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Secondly the USA was already engaged with Iraq and Afghanistan and unable to fight Iran all at once and the situation would have been more complex at that time.
As I have stated they are laying the groundwork, or could it be that the USA does not want to fight a multiple front war at the same time.
Secondly there is no proof of Iran funding groups that killed US service men in Iraq, I might be mistaken though
Now lets ask the question why would iran fund groups to cause turmoil in iraq? How about because if the situation in iraq was 100% on par with US schedule then they may attack Iran. Iran may have been attempting to delay an attack on itself.
How many things have we violated? Geneva convention, torture etc..
If I shot you with a tank while you only have a 9 mm does that make me a super badass superpower?
What did Vietnam have to do with US citizens and allies?
not an opinion, religion plays very heavily into US politics.
I'm not advocating an attack on Iran but that argument doesn't hold water. In Gulf War -I The US alone deployed over 545,000 troops to the region. In Gulf War -II we had a littel over 165,000 in Iraq and around 34,000 in Afghanistan. [Presently around 88,000] = 253,000 subtract that from Gulf war - I figures that leaves over 292,000 US boots on the ground for Iran. Nor does your argument address the question of why in the 34+ years since the regime took power the US hasn't cleaned their clocks. I mean after all of all the Middle East countries Iran has been the most outspoken.
We were already fighting multiple front wars. Iraq and Afghanistan....
Nice pipe dream. The fact remains the trained, funded and even participated in attacks on US personal in Iraq and many Iranians covertly fighting in Iraq never made it home. I wonder what excuses their Government made why many of their sons never returned home
Why can’t you stay on the topic of Iran? Why must you deflect! If US has been wrong, I must ask…do two wrongs make a right? Saying “the US did it” doesn’t justify Iran’s actions!
What it tells me is you’re an you’re a FOOL for instigating a man with a tank while you’re only holding a 9mm. Again, this makes any reasonable person question Iran’s judgment.
US was preventing the spread of communism in the East. There were many "conflicts" and struggles going on at that time in that region.
You: Don’t bring a knife to a gun fight.
Me: You are asking Iran not to bring a gun to a gun fight. You are the one telling Iran not to arm themselves.
Influence is different than Theocracy!
How many military interventions has the USA performed in the past 100 years compared to Irans past 100 years.
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Iraqis welcome Iranian interference to help them get rid of the US occupation