reply to post by michaelbrux
yeah, and without the people and their right to bear arms the Sheriff doesn't exist, nor do the Feds and by extension the Law or your point.
Again you profoundly and grossly misunderstand law. The right of the people to keep and bear arms does not exist so that Sheriff's and "Feds" may
exist, the right to keep and bear arms exists because government agents like Sheriff's and "Feds" exist.
The Sheriff is not some mystical savior, merely an elected official tasked with law enforcement. As long as that Sheriff is doing their job, the need
of the people to keep and bear arms is a dormant need. Long before the People take up arms against criminal government officials, there is a
Constitutional process of redress of grievance and seeking remedy. Long before the People take up arms against corrupt "Feds", there are Sheriff's
and State Attorney Generals and Judges in place to handle the problem first. If those Sheriff's, State Attorney Generals, and Judges fail the
People, then and only then, will it be time for People to take up arms against corrupt government. We are no where near that point, and it is
interesting you are so eager to encourage people in that direction while dismissing the notion of due process.