posted on Jun, 12 2012 @ 04:44 AM
Originally posted by hawkiye
Why don't you back that tripe up with some hard evidence?
Really lol? How about the war we've been in for how many years now? Do you really think it's to save us from the new boogie-man?
Well um Lenin, Stalin, and Hitler come mind here oh how about Mao, Polpot, Edi Amen, Saddam, etc etc. you Might want to rethink this
Oh jeez Hitler was not left-wing, he was a right-wing fascist. Saddam lol? Mao killed no one intentionally, the numbers were exaggerated, those that
did die was from famine that started before Mao was in power, which he had no control over.
You mean Idi Amen? He was a military dictator, not left-wing lol. Next... Pol Pot?? Another dictator, not left-wing by any stretch of the true
As I have tried to explain to you the definition of a term is not based on what people do. If I called myself a christian, but openly worshiped the
she-devil, would that mean christianity is she-devil worship? Again bad logic.
Since WWII left wing terms have been used politically in ways that do not reflect their true definitions, and the true goals of socialists. Socialism
of the people, not of authority and power seekers.
I am debating worker ownership, you are debating kings and queens.
edit on 6/12/2012 by ANOK because: (no reason given)