It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I wonder if those posting know they are about to be charged with a Felony and may go to prison?
A mere threat that does not cause any harm is generally not actionable. When combined with apparently imminent bodily harm, however, a threat is an assault for which the offender might be subject to civil or criminal liability. In most jurisdictions, a plaintiff can recover damages for the intentional infliction of severe mental or emotional suffering caused by threats or unlawful communications.
Whoever transmits in interstate or foreign commerce any communication containing any threat to kidnap any person or any threat to injure the person of another, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
So long as the threat on its face and in the circumstances in which it is made is so unequivocal, unconditional, immediate and specific as to the person threatened, as to convey a gravity of purpose and imminent prospect of execution, the statute may properly be applied. This clarification of the scope of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) is, we trust, consistent with a rational approach to First Amendment construction which provides for governmental authority in instances of inchoate conduct, where a communication has become "so interlocked with violent conduct as to constitute for all practical purposes part of the (proscribed) action itself."
They do prosecute this stuff I assure you. I had a friend who called up a person in another State who owed him money and threatened to break one of his legs if he did not pay. The next day the FBI arrested him and his Wife came to me trying to gather money to bail him out.
Personally I think it should be assumed they meant what they posted. To do otherwise is to invite a tragedy.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Originally posted by ThinkingCap
You folks and your "Left wing, right wing" banter is hilarious. Great way to ignore the problem. It reminds me of racism in a way. Blaming a handful of idiots for an entire 'culture'.
We're all in this together. The eagle is in a cage. Why do you care 'which wing you like the most'?
Economically Conservative, Socially Liberal.
While we should all be in this together, we are not. We are instead all paddling about in our canoes laughing at the other paddlers, and the ones who like to laugh the loudest are the ones who claim they are "economically conservative and socially liberal" as if this has some kind of profound meaning. There is nothing at all profound in declaring oneself "economically conservative, socially liberal". If you're not conserving the Constitutional principles that remain a profound indictment on government, then your hallow claims of being "economically conservative" only fall prey to your "socially liberal" ideals.
A genuine "conservative" of the United States is not some "dittohead" status quo loving Christian right wing zealot, but is one who zealously fights for conservation of the Constitution that grants government its power, and they do so because there are far too many out there who take way too "liberal" of a view of that same Constitution. The only true "economically conservative" American is that American fighting for small government, because when it comes to government the only way to get them to be "economically conservative" is by reducing their size and authority, but try convincing the "socially liberal" of that.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
reply to post by Blaine91555
I wonder if those posting know they are about to be charged with a Felony and may go to prison?
Threat Legal Definition:
A mere threat that does not cause any harm is generally not actionable. When combined with apparently imminent bodily harm, however, a threat is an assault for which the offender might be subject to civil or criminal liability. In most jurisdictions, a plaintiff can recover damages for the intentional infliction of severe mental or emotional suffering caused by threats or unlawful communications.
U.S.C. 18 Section 875:
Well in that case, I should press charges against all the religious nuts in government that have repeatedly threatened me and my brothers / sisters with harm.
I'm for liberty. period. other things have to be worked out in compromise but it all comes down to liberty, love and human rights. Those are all greatly absent from governance. Our government bases itself upon restriction, hatred and oppression. That's wrong. It's morally and cosmically wrong.
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by AwakeinNM
Nope its the sub class of unevolved idiots called poor religious people.
It really doesnt matter what their politcal opinion is... they are to stupid from reading the "good" book to understand. Im glad i had the chance to set you straight on what kind of people your talking about.
Originally posted by sweetliberty
reply to post by guohua
If the twitters are in fact young, I can see how they think they'll get away with spreading their filth.
We have a liberal media that promotes killing and or bullying through the upside down promotion of so called equality.
They see adults acting like children, grouping and labeling those who don't conform.
When a society lacks leadership or they elect someone who claims to "lead from behind", its not surprising to see the youth mimic the hate filled adults.
We defend the killing of gender selection, infanticide, and we dismiss the rights of the elderly in favor of the younger stronger humans.
This is the result of the liberal mob mentality and regardless of the media spin, its waking up the American people.
The lack of support for the public unions and the increase of support for fiscal responsibility is among the many reasons why Walker wasn't recalled.
America opposes the liberal mob.