Originally posted by ImaFungi
These questions are asked as if you are all that exist as a point of awareness..they pertain to your potential desires, your perspective and
If I exist at ALL points of awareness, I'd be God, or at least an aspect. Therefore:
If you could be anything what would you be?
It there is no would. I AM. lol
what would you be composed of?
All that exists.
where would you be located?
what would you be able to do?
what would be your objective/purpose for existing?
No objectives for existing, but plenty for keeping busy.
would you be satisfied existing as this creation of yours forever?
No. I'm the programmer, I'd like to get back to programming.
would you desiree to be alone?( alone forever?) if not,, what would your company consist of? what would be their forms and functions and would
they be their own entities, or a figment of your creation like the personal world of your dreams and the scenarios and pseudo people you encounter
I'd want companions who cannot trump me, but who are individuals, so,. they'd have to be like me enough to understand me to
some degree, but would have to fall flat on their face a few times, so that they'd both know their place, and learn to ask for my help.
If you would make an abode for your spirit and company how large would it be and what would be its purpose?
No, my abode would live
inside me. Occasionally I'd come to visit.
what would be some long term goals ( long term = eons of eternal infinities) of your creation?
and how would you keep it in check ( keep things from going out of hand, breaking down, failing, errors in the processing of whatever material
you make your creation out of)
It's called reboot the laws that govern how the creation runs. Change a law and *poof* no more
how would you establish concepts or morals, or absolutes, or truth, or knowledge,, what would these things mean and how would they be known to
exist objectively and timelessly?
I'd let them break themselves so that they can learn to rise above their train-wrecks.
how can value or worth be objectively justified between parts or pieces of your creation?
Input equals output. If I design something
to be spectacular, it's worth spectacular. If something was given the potential for spectacular and this thing deliberately refused to try? It
abused it's value, and has made itself worthless.
is it possible to judge and grade between parts, companions, granules, concepts,., and have
those judgements mean anything?
If I am God, then if I put value on it, it has value. The judgement mean something if the creation pays
attention to the fact that I set the value. If they start moving the marks around, then it's not going to work out right, for them.
is meaningful judgement only possible if meaning/purpose is pre established or absolute and eternally existing?
or is meaning/ purpose that is spontaneously realized, noticed, and felt.... real and relevant,, and immediate proof of the possibility of meaning and
purpose existing as a concept and an active construct?
You sidestep the issue by giving out POTENTIAL.