It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I believe ATS should start instituting an age requirement or maturity level that is conducive to civil discussion. Trolling and childish behavior should be treated as harshly as a break in T&C.
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by maxella1
All the fuel was consumed in the initial explosion then? How could all the fuel explode at once?
Nobody who saw a flood of burning gas in the buildings survived to be sure.
What happened to the 22nd floor?
With a few special exceptions, building codes in the United States do not permit the use of fire-protected elevators for routine emergency access by first responders or as a secondary method (after stairwells) for emergency evacuation of building occupants. The use of elevators by first responders would additionally mitigate counterflow problems in stairwells. While the United States conducted research on specially protected elevators in the late 1970s, the United Kingdom along with several other countries that typically utilize British standards have required such “firefighter lifts,” located in protected shafts, for a number of years. Without functioning elevators (e.g., due to a power failure or major water leakage), first responders carrying gear typically require about a minute per floor to reach an incident using the stairs. While it is difficult to maintain this pace for more than about the first 20 stories, it would take a first responder about an hour to reach, for example, the 60th floor of a tall building if that pace could be maintained. Such a delay, combined with the resulting fatigue and physical effects on first responders that were reported on September 11, 2001, would make firefighting and rescue efforts difficult even in tall building emergencies not involving a terrorist attack. Each of the WTC towers had
106 elevators, and WTC 7 had 38 elevators. By code, the elevators could not be used for fire service access or occupant egress during an emergency since they were not fire-protected, nor were they located in protected shafts. The elevators were equipped through normal modernization with fire service recall. Most were damaged by the aircraft impacts; though prior to the impact in WTC 2 the elevators were functioning and contributed greatly to the much faster initial evacuation rate in WTC 2.
Originally posted by maxella1
Originally posted by kdog1982
Ok,got to about 18 minutes into the video.
I'm done with this nonsense.
Totally heavily edited and misinformed.
Ya'll have fun with this one.
I will be polite and not say what I think of those who agree with this video.
What heavily edited and misinformed part did you see in the 18 minutes?
Originally posted by tide88
If you ask me, this whole conspiracy was contrived by developers and building contractors in NYC to cover their own asses. How many other buildings in NY were constructed using these sub par standards?
Im in the construction field, these builders cut all sorts of corners when they build these high rises. I can only imagine the kind of corners that were cut building the Twin Towers or how many bribes were paid so they were able to cut those corners.
Originally posted by kdog1982
Originally posted by maxella1
Originally posted by kdog1982
Ok,got to about 18 minutes into the video.
I'm done with this nonsense.
Totally heavily edited and misinformed.
Ya'll have fun with this one.
I will be polite and not say what I think of those who agree with this video.
What heavily edited and misinformed part did you see in the 18 minutes?
You are smart enough to find this and post it.
I would hope that you are smart enough to research it and figure it out.
If you ask me, this whole conspiracy was contrived by developers and building contractors in NYC to cover their own asses. How many other buildings in NY were constructed using these sub par standards?
Originally posted by tide88
reply to post by SimontheMagus
I you would read the report, you would see that they were far from structurally sound buildings, but you are probably right, its a total cover up. People from the president to the lowly construction workers who planted the bombs were all in on it and nobody has ever come forward. Hell, the airlines were also in on it, as well as NORAD, CNN, etc... Your right, that explains everything. Keep digging, even though everything has been debunked or explained.
Originally posted by SimontheMagus
Originally posted by tide88
reply to post by SimontheMagus
I you would read the report, you would see that they were far from structurally sound buildings, but you are probably right, its a total cover up. People from the president to the lowly construction workers who planted the bombs were all in on it and nobody has ever come forward. Hell, the airlines were also in on it, as well as NORAD, CNN, etc... Your right, that explains everything. Keep digging, even though everything has been debunked or explained.
Nothing has been "explained" and nothing has been "debunked". It's all in your head. Many people have come forward. Their testimony was either thrown out with gag orders... or they have been made out to be "nutjobs" by the controlled media.....or they're dead.edit on 14-5-2012 by SimontheMagus because: (no reason given)edit on 14-5-2012 by SimontheMagus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by maxella1
What happened to the 22nd floor?
What happened is the biggest planes ever built filled with 10,000 gallons of Jet Fuel slammed into the upper stories of the World Trade Center at hundreds of miles per hour causing just exactly what everyone there in the city that day and everyone else viewed live on any TV station all over the whole world. It went something like this...
BOOOM...BURRRRN...COLLAAAAAPSE...
(times two)
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by ANOK
Err... explosives, maybe?
Maybe? I thought you were so sure about that. But I said I would listen so... why were there explosives in the basement?
Originally posted by intrptr
What happened is the biggest planes ever built
Andy Card told him, "The second tower also failed to detonate".
Originally posted by intrptr
Is this one of those never ending threads that the OP brings and disagrees with every single point brought by others? Counter points of "time released fires" lol are not a counterpoint at all. I guess in order to get ones point across to someone who dismisses others by saying "Whats your point?" over and over---
(never mind, there is no point)
intrptr bails off the 100th floor...
All the fuel was consumed in the initial explosion then? How could all the fuel explode at once?
A Boeing 757 hit a tall building that wasn't structurally sound.
On 911 the waterfall of jet fuel aerosol may have contributed to any explosions. Fuel vapor explosions in confined spaces (like an elevator shaft) would be well... explosive. All the way to the ground or basement or lobby, whatever.
Another thing is when you have a fire,the sprinklers would go off and water pouring down an elevator shaft would also short out many things.
They used ONE elevator on 9/11
Norad ?? Thats my question # 1. These were commercial flights that were highjacked. Norad doesnt even enter the euqation.
Let people watch it.... thats fine but the whole premise is flawed...
The "explosions" in the basement were a result OF the plane impact and the resulting fireballs coming down the shafts
That's because too many people don't understand how the real world works. They take the view that there's a conspiracy in every event.
9/11 was not about killing innocent people and trapping them in the towers...
It;s not worth watching as you understand how elevators work in an emergency situation... don't worry too much about it.