It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You can just go close your eyes and stick your head in the sand and pretend none of this is going on...but the rest of us aren't going to.
Gallup is out with a new poll suggesting a whopping 40 percent of Americans say President Obama's newly public support of gay marriage will affect their votes.
Of those, 26 percent say it will make them less likely to vote for Obama, while 13 percent say it will make them more likely to vote for him.
The critical number in the poll, though is for independents - 23 percent of whom said the gay marriage support makes it less likely they will vote for Obama.
Originally posted by jibeho
Whoah!! Freedom to love and marry who they want??? I keep hearing that. Like Bidens speech on loving one another.. Sure. So, does that include those who "love" children, and "love" relatives enough to want to marry one. (pedophiles and incest) How about those who choose to love many men or women and wish to marry all of them? Animal Lovers?? Sure its extreme but the same logic can apply.
Where does it stop? When does it stop?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Stormdancer777
Hi.
That's what I expected - a net loss. I suspect it will all change before the election, though. I don't think we'll be talking about this in a week from now, much less 6 months from now. I think he did it for donations and to test the water.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Stormdancer777
Hi.
That's what I expected - a net loss. I suspect it will all change before the election, though. I don't think we'll be talking about this in a week from now, much less 6 months from now. I think he did it for donations and to test the water.
HI BH, yea maybe he was waiting for the right moment, could be.
Most likely, he has always supported it but lied in 2008 to gain Christian support.
though the timing leaves much to be desired
The timing still leaves me with many questions.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Does this bother you at all?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Does this bother you at all?
Does it bother me that Obama lied? Of course it bothers me. I don't like it when people lie. I suspected he was lying at the time (during the 2008 campaign).
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
But please, don't try and hijack a word and dictate to those who hold a traditional viewpoint, that they are wrong for believing the way they do.
I'm suggesting stripping the word "marriage" from any type of legal definition, in favor of calling all unions civil unions, to fulfill the legal requirements and allow for equal benefits.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Most likely, he has always supported it but lied in 2008 to gain Christian support.
I'm just glad he has come clean. He is taking his slogan of FORWARD seriously and I hope that he continues in that vein.
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by Six6Six
HE is a homo himself..closet homo.
How nice of you to let your homophopia show so plainly.
It's funny how some people think they are being clever with an insult...and they are just making themselves look stupid.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Freenrgy2
Originally posted by Freenrgy2
But please, don't try and hijack a word and dictate to those who hold a traditional viewpoint, that they are wrong for believing the way they do.
But isn't that what you're doing? Hijacking the word and dictating to those who hold a contemporary point of view, that they are wrong for believing the way they do?
See, the difference is, I am using the word marriage and my spouse and I define OUR marriage. Each couple should have the freedom to define their own marriage, don't you think? To make their own rules about child rearing, finances, communication and so on?
I'm suggesting stripping the word "marriage" from any type of legal definition, in favor of calling all unions civil unions, to fulfill the legal requirements and allow for equal benefits.
That would be fine with me. But that's not where we are right now. Right now, in this country, marriage is a legal contract. Marriage is a civil union. Everyone that's married has entered into a legal contract. Not everyone that's married got married "in the eyes of God". Atheists have been getting married for centuries and no one ever batted an eye.
My position is that my marriage has nothing to do with yours. We can have our own definition of the word and no one gets hurt. How does it hurt you that we have different definitions? How does it affect anyone's marriage?
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by Stormdancer777
Hi.
That's what I expected - a net loss. I suspect it will all change before the election, though. I don't think we'll be talking about this in a week from now, much less 6 months from now. I think he did it for donations and to test the water.
HI BH, yea maybe he was waiting for the right moment, could be.
www.chicagotribune.com...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama called his decision to support same-sex marriage the result of a personal evolution but it also appears to have been a calculated political choice made with an eye on the November 6 election.
In becoming the first U.S. president to publicly support gay marriage, polling analysts said Thursday, Obama essentially is betting that his decision will generate enough enthusiasm among young people to offset any votes he will lose from moderate and conservative whites who disagree with him.
A key part of Obama's calculus, analysts said, also will be to hold on to the enormous majority he enjoys among black voters. Church-going blacks are divided over gay marriage but pollsters say they are unlikely to vote for Republican Mitt Romney over Obama, the nation's first black president, in November.
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by Stormdancer777
The timing still leaves me with many questions.
Apparently people aren't concerned about the timing, all they seem to care about is that he said it...Where is the common sense in that?
President-elect Obama's answer to a 1996 Outlines newspaper question on marriage was: "I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages."
In 2004, Barack Obama stated in a US Senate campaign debate with Alan Keyes that marriage is between one man and one woman, and that he supports civil unions but not gay marriage.
...
He continued by asserting that homosexuality is innate and is not a choice, and that marriage is not a civil right but a tradition that needed to be preserved.
These views on marriage, civil unions, and religion were continually reaffirmed throughout the 2008 campaign. In an interview with Pastor Rick Warren, Senator Obama defined marriage as between one man and one woman and noted that it was also a sacred union in which God was a factor.