It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Surfrat
His plan is to encourage men to have more anal sex in order to reduce the amount of birth control pills needed by women; and reducing number of abortions needed thus reducing the cost of his health care program
It's not that the Left is "redefining" marriage — it's that conservatives must redefine the debate. The question in this debate should never be one of rights. It should be one of definitions. If we accept that marriage is, by definition, the union between a man and woman and nothing else, the faux-marriage-rights argument is moot. In case you’re wondering, I’m using the word “cannot” properly in the above title. No, I don’t mean “same-sex couples should not marry” — rather, they aren’t capable of doing so.
For you cannot have a right to that which doesn’t exist. This isn’t just semantics. If social engineers insist on pushing faux marriage, we must demand that they first attempt to redefine the institution.
Originally posted by maxella1
No, Mr. President, Same-sex Couples Cannot Marry
It's not that the Left is "redefining" marriage — it's that conservatives must redefine the debate. The question in this debate should never be one of rights. It should be one of definitions. If we accept that marriage is, by definition, the union between a man and woman and nothing else, the faux-marriage-rights argument is moot. In case you’re wondering, I’m using the word “cannot” properly in the above title. No, I don’t mean “same-sex couples should not marry” — rather, they aren’t capable of doing so.
For you cannot have a right to that which doesn’t exist. This isn’t just semantics. If social engineers insist on pushing faux marriage, we must demand that they first attempt to redefine the institution.
It sounds right to me.
Originally posted by Surfrat
His plan is to encourage men to have more anal sex in order to reduce the amount of birth control pills needed by women; and reducing number of abortions needed thus reducing the cost of his health care program
Originally posted by maxella1
No, Mr. President, Same-sex Couples Cannot Marry
It's not that the Left is "redefining" marriage — it's that conservatives must redefine the debate. The question in this debate should never be one of rights. It should be one of definitions. If we accept that marriage is, by definition, the union between a man and woman and nothing else, the faux-marriage-rights argument is moot. In case you’re wondering, I’m using the word “cannot” properly in the above title. No, I don’t mean “same-sex couples should not marry” — rather, they aren’t capable of doing so.
For you cannot have a right to that which doesn’t exist. This isn’t just semantics. If social engineers insist on pushing faux marriage, we must demand that they first attempt to redefine the institution.
It sounds right to me.
www.merriam-webster.com...
Definition of MARRIAGE
1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by maxella1
www.merriam-webster.com...
Definition of MARRIAGE
1 a (1) : the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2) : the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage
look how modern and well-rounded are both our Merriam and our Webster...
although, I'm sure we'll now hear all about how the communists rewrote the dictionary
have at it
:-)