It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And if you want to know how Anne feels why didn't you ask her how she felt 4 years ago in 2008?....She is obviously taking sides of a flip flopper meaning she is one herself...
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
My opinion your after? Why are you wasting your time on what I think? I think there are better things to worry about then this same sex marriage issue at this time....I am just saying it is a waste of time and mind...
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
My opinion your after? Why are you wasting your time on what I think? I think there are better things to worry about then this same sex marriage issue at this time....I am just saying it is a waste of time and mind...
I am wasting my time if you're not up to answering a simple question
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by Annee
Civil Rights? Wow you are just trying to blow this out of proportion aren't you?....The economy first, then we can worry about matters that only happen to certain individuals like you are saying...
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by Annee
When did "I" ever mention the word "civil rights"?...While posting in this thread? Go all the way back to page one, and read up sweetie...
You are making it a really big issue...
Really, this didn't become a Civil Rights issue until you showed up Anne. Good Job
Originally posted by rickymouse
He leaves it up to the states and to the people of those states.
For what logical reason should states make laws on marriage?
Yes - - I realize it is part of the Constitution
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by Annee
For what logical reason should states make laws on marriage?
Yes - - I realize it is part of the Constitution
^^Really Annee? You don't know the logical reason?
More deflection?
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by Annee
Well, that's one way Obama can avoid the issue at the Federal Government level. I always thought each individual religion was supposed to define marriage. How did marriage ever become of government in the first place? Regulating too closely related people from getting married and having offspring was the original reason.
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by Annee
Really, in actuality it is not the business of government at all.