It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by MoreThanTheSum
As this thread has gotten its fair share of debunkers, I feel the need to ask a few questions of them, as I am of the belief that these objects are UFOs. Not necessarily aliens, but UFOs in the traditional sense.
Questions are good, since they focus on answers, and I have a standard set of "99 FAQs" that address many of your general questions on my website, here
www.jamesoberg.com/ufo.html
at the link labeled "99 FAQs on 'Space UFOs'"
Now, before responding to specific questions on THESE videos, please answer -- how can anyone fairly expect a plausible prosaic explanation for a video posted without date, without time, without names of witnesses, and basically without any evidence it's anything but a CGI prank?
That's my question. Answers, please.
Originally posted by gortex
Ah back to the ISS ,or the shuttle in the case of the second video .
The only problem I have with these videos is nothing in them either changes direction or slows down , just stuff going in one direction and at a constant speed .
There are approximately 3,000 satellites operating in Earth orbit and an estimated 8,000 man-made objects , why can't the objects in the video be one of those .
Plus I don't think its a good sign when a video starts with " more NASA lies"
Originally posted by SaturnFX
I would like to see a video of a UFO..a proper alien (or other) spacecraft zipping around. But, first I must dismiss the unremarkable in order to know when I seen something truly interesting. And this video is of the unremarkable category.
Originally posted by MoreThanTheSum
3) Last video, last object: How would ice particles or space debris remain in a perfect equilateral triangular formation? I'm going off of the premise that the video has -not- been tampered with, and I would like you to at least attempt the same. That explanation is a cop-out, in my opinion. I am willing to be convinced, but simply screaming "fake!" isn't going to do it for me.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by MoreThanTheSum
3) Last video, last object: How would ice particles or space debris remain in a perfect equilateral triangular formation? I'm going off of the premise that the video has -not- been tampered with, and I would like you to at least attempt the same. That explanation is a cop-out, in my opinion. I am willing to be convinced, but simply screaming "fake!" isn't going to do it for me.
I see 3 objects.
I don't see a triangle. Well, I mean, I do if I wanted to pretend there was some sort of invisible matter between them, but I don't. I can see triangles everywhere if I did that...as it only takes 3 points and perspective play.
torwards the end of its flight, you will see its not a perfect triangle anyhow as the bottom moves up.
Yes, now this is where you say its perspective...the craft thingie is turning. No..see, thats when your trying to see patterns where there are none.
So, what are the three objects then? I don't know..but what could it be? well, could be lots of things...and most of those things that it could be are quite natural. such as space junk, ice, etc. Sure, it could be some weird invisible alien megacraft with running lights on its corners visible for some reason, but I doubt it.
As far as it disappearing right at the end, well, I want some authenticity check on the film frankly. I would want to see the actual film on the nasa website that shows the same before I even start contemplating it (odd enough to raise an eyebrow, but not enough credibility to believe what I am seeing is raw footage before I start digging)
Originally posted by MoreThanTheSum
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by MoreThanTheSum
As this thread has gotten its fair share of debunkers, I feel the need to ask a few questions of them, as I am of the belief that these objects are UFOs. Not necessarily aliens, but UFOs in the traditional sense.
Questions are good, since they focus on answers, and I have a standard set of "99 FAQs" that address many of your general questions on my website, here
www.jamesoberg.com/ufo.html
at the link labeled "99 FAQs on 'Space UFOs'"
Now, before responding to specific questions on THESE videos, please answer -- how can anyone fairly expect a plausible prosaic explanation for a video posted without date, without time, without names of witnesses, and basically without any evidence it's anything but a CGI prank?
That's my question. Answers, please.
You'd make a really good politician, you know that? That's one of my problems with debunkers. Dodging. I already said I'm going with the premise that the video is at least authentic, now, disprove that these are UFO's from -that- standpoint. It's not impossible to fake a video like that, but from my knowledge, these are from the official live feed--or at least snippets of it. As for witnesses, why on earth would you expect to be able to get names of witnesses from inside NASA? Either the white OR black NASA? Seriously? That's just inane. And, in conclusion, I'll offer a reply that I haven't offered anyone since 4th grade: "I asked you first."
Originally posted by FlySolo
Originally posted by gortex
Ah back to the ISS ,or the shuttle in the case of the second video .
The only problem I have with these videos is nothing in them either changes direction or slows down , just stuff going in one direction and at a constant speed .
There are approximately 3,000 satellites operating in Earth orbit and an estimated 8,000 man-made objects , why can't the objects in the video be one of those .
Plus I don't think its a good sign when a video starts with " more NASA lies"
I have a problem with that being the case here.
If these are satellites or space junk, how can the formation change?
Originally posted by Mr_skepticc
I have to say that 2nd video really does make me wonder. If the video hasn't been tampered with in any way, well I would really like to know what those could be. I'm gonna go with top secret jets, or some type of flying military deal we just don't know about.
Originally posted by MoreThanTheSum
[ I never said it was a single triangular craft. If anything, I'd -like- to believe it's a formation of some sort. However, now that I see that last object chopped into a frame-by-frame .gif, there is some changing going on there. And, admittedly, it's not triangular, and it could be illusory. I'll give you that. However, at least from what I'm watching, the bottom two points in the "triangle" seem to remain equidistant from each other. Ice particles usually can't do that; the odds are astronomical, as they are close to the camera, small, and moving in three dimensions.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by MoreThanTheSum
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by MoreThanTheSum
As this thread has gotten its fair share of debunkers, I feel the need to ask a few questions of them, as I am of the belief that these objects are UFOs. Not necessarily aliens, but UFOs in the traditional sense.
Questions are good, since they focus on answers, and I have a standard set of "99 FAQs" that address many of your general questions on my website, here
www.jamesoberg.com/ufo.html
at the link labeled "99 FAQs on 'Space UFOs'"
Now, before responding to specific questions on THESE videos, please answer -- how can anyone fairly expect a plausible prosaic explanation for a video posted without date, without time, without names of witnesses, and basically without any evidence it's anything but a CGI prank?
That's my question. Answers, please.
You'd make a really good politician, you know that? That's one of my problems with debunkers. Dodging. I already said I'm going with the premise that the video is at least authentic, now, disprove that these are UFO's from -that- standpoint. It's not impossible to fake a video like that, but from my knowledge, these are from the official live feed--or at least snippets of it. As for witnesses, why on earth would you expect to be able to get names of witnesses from inside NASA? Either the white OR black NASA? Seriously? That's just inane. And, in conclusion, I'll offer a reply that I haven't offered anyone since 4th grade: "I asked you first."
"SuperSigma", if you haven't looked over my "99 FAQ's", you're dodging. I try to explain the general ways that normal spaceflight can create scenes exactly such as these, without recourse to extraordinary stimuli.
As to you asking "in general" first, I had answered even before you asked - -see "99 FAQs..."
As for witnesses, who the heck do you think is aboard the space shuttle, station, or in mission control -- illegal aliens with fake documents? Every NASA-related 'space UFO' video has specific people involved -- people in orbit, people in Hiouston -- whose names can be determined. Every one -- as long as the poser of the challenge is hionest enough to provide the date/time of the event.
Are you seriously suggesting that we don't NEED to know the surrounding activity, illumination, thrusting, and other day-to-day ordinary spaceflight activities, to fully evaluate a scene? That seems to me a formula for eternal pointless speculation.
How about us both working together on some answers?
But 'dodging'.... I don't think that word means what you think it means. So far as I can tell i'm the ONLY guy hereabouts who meets real 'space ufo' events/videos dead-on with real investigation.
Originally posted by FlySolo
reply to post by SaturnFX
Ba. Baloney. That's a changing formation.
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
nice vid OP, most debunkers are gonna debunk as it's their job, they know little else.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by MoreThanTheSum
[ I never said it was a single triangular craft. If anything, I'd -like- to believe it's a formation of some sort. However, now that I see that last object chopped into a frame-by-frame .gif, there is some changing going on there. And, admittedly, it's not triangular, and it could be illusory. I'll give you that. However, at least from what I'm watching, the bottom two points in the "triangle" seem to remain equidistant from each other. Ice particles usually can't do that; the odds are astronomical, as they are close to the camera, small, and moving in three dimensions.
Well, I take it then that you'd be surprised to learn that the Pentagon flies 'triple satellite formations' in orbit?
satobs.org...
Originally posted by MoreThanTheSum
And as for NASA, my point was: what kind of response do you think you're going to get if you -ask- for astronaut witnesses? I didn't say they were aliens, don't speak for me. I'm saying do you think NASA's going to just give you names? Hundreds of people, pictures, files, etc. have disappeared into that abyss, and they protect their own. Most likely, you're going to be laughed out of the office for even asking, as they've been trained to believe that there is no such thing as UFOs. Anywhere. Which, in my opinion, is a mathematical impossibility.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Originally posted by FlySolo
reply to post by SaturnFX
Ba. Baloney. That's a changing formation.
Maybe they are morphing into a transformer then if you can decide what your seeing verses simply observe what is presented.
Its a glow snake wiggling around space.
no...there is no formation...if these objects were viewed a minute earler, they would more than likely be very far apart...your just getting a few seconds and thinking that before the cameras caught it, it was in the same shape as the first second it came into view.
Originally posted by TheFlash
What about the objects moving around and forming a pattern in space on shuttle mission STS-80? What that space junk also?
If you are not familiar with the footage, here it is:
Narrated video recorded on shuttle mission STS-80.