Originally posted by fbluth
reply to post by rebellender
No what this means is that if people have nothing to add to a conversation they attack things that aren't relevant. People who have to point out spelling or grammar mistakes have nothing to add to the conversation.
I read 307 pages of post, I post my one comment and immediately I get attacked. I didn't post anything false or misleading. I posted my thoughts on the case.....and bam....right out the wood work comes the ATS patrol. If this is how members like to welcome new members, then, most likely, I won't stick around long either.
I prefer intelligent, respectful conversation.....not just one side attack that don't advance the conversation.
Are you a fiction writer by profession, or is it just a hobby?
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by fbluth
Well there is the big difference between our ways of thinking. You think guilty, until some amazing evidence shows up proving him innocent. I think innocent, until some amazing evidence comes out proving him guilty. I side with the law.
Originally posted by Resurected
reply to post by TKDRL
There was an autopsy in this case which is still sealed but i imagine it part of why the Murder2 charge came around.. Now i consider lethal force to be when one persons life in danger.. From what we see Zimmerman's life not in danger even if he had the back of his head busted.. Now, if this had been a typical ghetto neighborhood and 2 typical ghetto males in a fight and one shot.. Do you think that person left standing would not be taken in? I imagine powder burns will tell alot in this case.edit on 29-4-2012 by Resurected because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rebellender
reply to post by popsmayhem
Good posting Popsmayhem!!!
Now if we can settle this issue then we have an issue to take up with the president of The United States.
Particularly why did he fuel a self defense incident with promotion of Race as an issue
edit on 23-3-2012 by rebellender because: (no reason given)
So the father lied, who cares