It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by michaelbrux
reply to post by FraternitasSaturni
the only troll here is you.
f off...thanx much.
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
One, if the above is literal, then where did the likeness of women come from?
Two, if women were so unimportant, then why the need for Jesus to be born to Mary? And because of this holy birth, how come the perception towards women did not change?
Now the next few statements, I must say require a thick skin for those that get offended easily, but this is the reason for discussion.
If women were considered to only be "2nd" made, then why are women more efficiently made for the continuation of life, as men are simply needed to provided needed "help" with the beginning, but afterward are no longer medically, nutritionally, or need to gestate?
Is it so hard to try to understand the need of women, or the understanding that the church has decided that there had to be a hidden agenda about women in general?
Third, if procreation was supposed to be a #1 goal, why would women who are far more complicated biologically be made second?
edit on 21-3-2012 by NoRegretsEver because: just thinking
Originally posted by windword
reply to post by darknull
My favorite one out of them is the book of Thomas, it tells of Jesus as a child and was wrote by his older brother Thomas.
What? Jesus had an older brother? Scandalous! I guess Mary wasn't a virgin after all!
Originally posted by lordpiney
Im pretty sure, when they referred to god creating man in his own image, they actually meant mankind.
Originally posted by mwood
Originally posted by lordpiney
Im pretty sure, when they referred to god creating man in his own image, they actually meant mankind.
Right.
The part that gets me is it says "OUR IMAGE". sounds to me like there is more than one god......
Originally posted by EarthCitizen23
Does Anyone have a clue as to why the Thread named:
What does "God created man in his image" mean to you? What about gay man?
Was Sent to the ATS TRASH BIN,, but this one and others have not been also.
Just asking because I ran across this one,, after finding the other gone and trying to figure out why,,, it had 15 posts and mine may have been the last,,,
Don't think I said anything wrong,,, No clue what happened,,, and don't remember who started that thread or I would write to them to ask.
Originally posted by Snoopy1978
Originally posted by EarthCitizen23
Does Anyone have a clue as to why the Thread named:
What does "God created man in his image" mean to you? What about gay man?
Was Sent to the ATS TRASH BIN,, but this one and others have not been also.
Just asking because I ran across this one,, after finding the other gone and trying to figure out why,,, it had 15 posts and mine may have been the last,,,
Don't think I said anything wrong,,, No clue what happened,,, and don't remember who started that thread or I would write to them to ask.
Surely because gays are an "abomination", should be put to horrible death and will forever roast in God's custom eternal bbq pit. Y'know, just obeying our "loving father's" word.
Disgusting.
"So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them" KJV
Originally posted by Redevilfan09
reply to post by NoRegretsEver
Doesn't the bible say that eve was made from the rib of Adam(the first apparent man)? Maybe creating a human was more important than humans reproducing back in the day.
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
One, if the above is literal, then where did the likeness of women come from?
Enlil was also espoused to Nin-khursag and their son was Ninurta (Ningirsu), the Mighty Hunter. By another wife, Ninlil (Sud), Enlil had a second son, Nanna (Suen), known as the Bright One. Nanna and his wife, Ningal, were the parents of Inanna (who was called Ishtar by the Babylonians), and who married the Shepherd King Dumu-zi (the latter given in the Semitic Old Testament book of Ezekiel 8:14 as Tammuz).
Another son of Enlil and Ninlil was Nergal (Meslamtaea), King of the Underworld. [color=gold] He married Eresh-kigal, the Queen of the Netherworld, the daughter of Nanna and Ningal (i.e. Inanna’s sister), and the mother of Lilith (who became handmaiden to Inanna, her maternal aunt). Lilith is also notorious as the first wife of Adam, but it was Lilith who rejected him (and thus incurred the wrath of every reject-worthy male on the planet).
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
Two, if women were so unimportant, then why the need for Jesus to be born to Mary? And because of this holy birth, how come the perception towards women did not change?
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
If women were considered to only be "2nd" made, then why are women more efficiently made for the continuation of life, as men are simply needed to provided needed "help" with the beginning, but afterward are no longer medically, nutritionally, or need to gestate?
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
Is it so hard to try to understand the need of women, or the understanding that the church has decided that there had to be a hidden agenda about women in general?
Sounds fair. However. As Laurence Gardner points out: “Enki was not happy about his brother’s promotion because, although Enlil was the elder of the two, his mother (Ki) was Anu’s junior sister, whereas Enki’s mother (Antu) was the senior sister. True kingship, claimed Enki, progressed as a matrilineal institution through the female line, and by this right of descent Enki maintained that he was the first born of the royal succession.”
Originally posted by NoRegretsEver
Third, if procreation was supposed to be a #1 goal, why would women who are far more complicated biologically be made second?