It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
looks you straight in the eye
then gives you something to chew on
Reps = gun control
Originally posted by mbkennel
The Republicans had a perfectly good candidate, and threw him away. No, not Ron Paul---but Jon Huntsman. He had a normal pro-business Republican economic policy, but he wasn't crazy nor (even though he is very wealthy too) was he stuck in the stinky air of the money extraction class.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Annee
See, you have the Statist view of John Dewey that government is here for the purpose of shaping our children in the model the State desires. You even admit it right here on this thread. The American form of government was not devised as a means to shape children's lives through a Statist program of social engineering. That all came out of the John Dewey/Humanist/Marxist point of view.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by jonnywhite
If they're going to spend millions of dollars incarcerating porn sellers/buyers then why don't they take that millions of dollars and put it into education? Sorry, this is just how I think about it. Can't help it.
To be fair, we have already pumped more money into education than most other countries, but the social engineers have been messing around with the values and mores by interfering with the parental authority via values clarification methods. Throwing more money into it is not going to change anything.
Also you should know that even John Dewey, a humanist, said that humanism is a religion and this is the basis for what is taught in schools today.
The question we ask is important. For humanism is the world view of our educational leaders, of the textbooks they write, of the psychologists who counsel our youngsters on values, sex, and death. In short, it is the world view of the curricula used in the public schools. In fact, humanism forms the philosophical basis of what passes for teacher education in our state colleges and universities.
Thus, if humanism is indeed a religion, then what we have in our public schools and state colleges and universities are government-supported establishments of religion, which are patently unconstitutional and therefore illegal.
In fact, it should be pointed out that on March 4, 1987, U.S. District Judge W. Brevard Hand, in Smith v. Board of School Commissioners of Mobile County, Ala., ruled that secular humanism is a religion. The 172-page ruling defines religion and concludes, after reviewing the relevant aspects of humanism, that “For purposes of the First Amendment, secular humanism is a religious belief system, entitled to the protections of, and subject to the prohibitions of, the religious clauses.”
thenewamerican.com...
THE BOULDER SUNDAY CAMERA - Guest Opinion March 29, 1987 Although it gives me pain to dispute a fellow humanist, particularly a good friend like Bill Cans (Open Forum March 16), I must register a complaint that, in the view of most humanists, secular humanism is not a religion. Rather. it is in the narrow sense an ethical philosophy of liberal scope, and in the broader sense it is the summation of all rational human knowledge. Despite the latter broad interpretation, it is interesting that the ideology has attracted so few who would accept its label. howardgarcia.com...
Originally posted by SaturnFX
But, if Santorum does win the Rep nomination, does this mean the reps are defaulted into irrelevancy?
Originally posted by HangTheTraitors
Republicans are OBSESSED with what folks do in their bedrooms.
Yet they are perfectly fine with SLAUGHTERING and KILLING mass amounts of women and children around the world.
Get a clue folks, stop electing these BASTARDS.
Originally posted by ICEKOHLD
most women hate the idea of their man watching porn...so they're gonna vote for a guy who is gonna make that illegal.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Again we find no difference between the two...
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by nenothtu
Again we find no difference between the two...
Who is "we"?
What is the solution?
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by SaturnFX
looks you straight in the eye
then gives you something to chew on
Reps = gun control
Very interesting.
Guns aren't divided by politics - - - they're mostly divided by geographical location.
If you live in a hunting area - - don't make no difference if you are Liberal or Conservative.
IMO - - majority of anti-gunners - - - are those who live in Major Cities - - - and buy their hamburger shrink wrapped.
Are we really so fearful of each other that we must arm ourselves in public?
Not anti- gun here. I just don't give a # if some yahoo wants the right to carry their compensator..err..gun with them in public.
reply to post by The Sword
Humans are not monogamous by nature.