It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
This is awesome.
Should Georgia exempt itself from federal law?
A panel of Georgia lawmakers would have the power to review federal law and declare it illegal under a proposal in the state Senate.
Senate Resolution 889 would create a "joint commission on recommendation" to advise on which federal laws infringed on the state. If approved by two-thirds of the General Assembly, Georgia residents would be exempted from following them.
Things to be exempted from :
- NDAA
- Patriot act
- Drug war
- Warrantless spying
- SOPA/PIPA
Stuff like that... Go Georgia! All states should pass that.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
reply to post by kaylaluv
That sounds a little scary to me. What's to stop them from re-instating slavery in their state, or outlawing interracial marriages, or other federal laws regarding civil rights? I don't think they can/should do this.
The bill of rights and constitution.
Also people are not THAT backwards.
The first time Andrew Jackson laid the smackdown on South Carolina and the second time 600,000 people died. Nullification is bad, it makes "The United States are" rather than "The United States is".
Originally posted by ThirdRock69
reply to post by Vitchilo
Are you forgetting Georgia just tried to drag Obama into court over the whole birth certificate thing. And they tried to get him thrown off the presidential ballot in their State?
In Georgia it's still illegal to buy alcohol on Sundays. You have to go to a special store and buy "packaged goods".
I don't even drink but I think Georgia is still pretty backwards and they are living about 20 years in the past compared to the rest of the USA.
Upfront they might try to make this about Freedom but it is a ruse and is most likely about racism.
I'm all for keeping the power of the State strong and letting States make their own laws.
That way I can avoid those States and all the good ol' boys . But saying they have the power to override Federal law is taking it too far. I think we all need to speak up and have the Federal Government repeal the patriot act Nationwide.edit on 23-2-2012 by ThirdRock69 because: (no reason given)
The last chance of ``voting`` making a change in Washington DC is Ron Paul. After that, it's up to the states to tell the feds to stick it. If the feds want to start war over it after that, it's their choice. They start the war, they lose.
i have yet to find anything as backwards as these, in Georgia and iv'e been there many times.
- NDAA
- Patriot act
- Drug war
- Warrantless spying
- SOPA/PIPA
Ron Paul is once of the worst choices. He does not believe in the inate right to privacy. As well Paul believed that the 9th Amendment gives the non-enumerated rights to the States rather than the People. Worst of all he does not believe in the incorporation of the Bill of Rights (meaning it doesn't apply to states).
Originally posted by Vitchilo
reply to post by SG-17
The first time Andrew Jackson laid the smackdown on South Carolina and the second time 600,000 people died. Nullification is bad, it makes "The United States are" rather than "The United States is".
Well whoever shoots first loses, so let the thugs in Washington DC start it if they really want it.
The feds are treasonous bullies and need to be stand up against.
The last chance of ``voting`` making a change in Washington DC is Ron Paul. After that, it's up to the states to tell the feds to stick it. If the feds want to start war over it after that, it's their choice. They start the war, they lose.
Originally posted by ThirdRock69
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
i have yet to find anything as backwards as these, in Georgia and iv'e been there many times.
- NDAA
- Patriot act
- Drug war
- Warrantless spying
- SOPA/PIPA
It would be hard for me to argue with you there.
But what's your point?
I actually would be very interested in how this would all play out. As long as this stayed a legal battle. No one wants any kind of violence I hope. The problem is if people don't accept the courts decisions.
I would like to hear someone come up with some kind of hypothetical scenario. Suppose you say the drug war or pick a different item on that list.
OK so Georgia changes it's policy on the drug war. What does that mean? They want to de-criminalize it? What? The Feds move in to make arrests and what a State militia will try to protect it's citizens from being arrested? Those citizens now are not safe to leave the State lest they be arrested?
states would not just go rogue because they decide the fed is out of order, what i think they would do is collectively decide that the fed has over stepped their bounds and unite on common ground. we are all Americans we are the people and it is us that must clean up this mess, because our feds will not give up their power without a struggle.
the fed has the power states give them, when enough states decide the fed has gotten out of line then collectively they must decide on how to set things back on course with our constitution and bill of rights.
Originally posted by ThirdRock69
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
states would not just go rogue because they decide the fed is out of order, what i think they would do is collectively decide that the fed has over stepped their bounds and unite on common ground. we are all Americans we are the people and it is us that must clean up this mess, because our feds will not give up their power without a struggle.
the fed has the power states give them, when enough states decide the fed has gotten out of line then collectively they must decide on how to set things back on course with our constitution and bill of rights.
no argument from me there. I agree with you. But the OP sounds a bit too gung ho there though and another post mentioned they would like to see this loosen their ability to get a silencer/suppressor for their gun? What was that about... LOL
well you know, to each his own. everyone has freedoms they would like to see again. not freedoms that would harm others which i think suppressor's would not, just a new toy to take to the range. i'm fairly certain there are many people with them now and we don't see a spree of killing from suppressor equipped guns.
Originally posted by ThirdRock69
well you know, to each his own. everyone has freedoms they would like to see again. not freedoms that would harm others which i think suppressor's would not, just a new toy to take to the range. i'm fairly certain there are many people with them now and we don't see a spree of killing from suppressor equipped guns.
It's just some peoples priorities I find......disturbing......amusing...... ...I don't know
This battle hopefully isn't about getting toys for the range ...is it?
I mean really, what is the goal here in your opinion?
Let try to go down the list
- NDAA
Explain the issues you have with this? Why would the Feds declare martial law ? Do you see a scenario where it might be necessary or not? Like in the event of natural disasters. Rioting and looting.
- Patriot act
I would love to see this repealed Nation wide
- Drug war
Georgia isn't going to go lighter on drug dealers so I don't even know what this one means.
- Warrantless spying
No examples I know of, we all know it happens anyway. This does worry many people, why? I don't like the idea of people being arrested and detained with out due process though.
- SOPA/PIPA ( not applicable these did not pass )
Originally posted by ThirdRock69
Sounds to me like another civil war is a brewing.
This doesn't sound like a good idea to me.
Originally posted by diatribe
Its a proposal that will never pass, the state has too much to loose in the way of returned tax dollars, to ever gamble on passing such a law.