It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
They had a different relationship with the elemental kingdoms in those days and were able to entice/command them to help build these structures - ie jinn, fairies, giants etc - nowadays we have them as ET's of various sorts.
There are plenty of stories of How Solomon used them to build his temple, and I have no doubt that inca used them to soften and mould granite stones.
Originally posted by Rocketman7
We are talking about something like 1/16 inch per rotation.
In other words the drill bit would rotate 16 times for every inch it went into the rock.
We use high speed drills. We don't have a drill that can drill into granite, going an inch in 16 turns.
I know the pet explanation is they used diamonds, or glued them to rope and used them as saws, but there is no evidence of them using diamond tipped drill bits. Tube shaped drill bits.
What we do have is bronze saw blades. They might have had diamond stuck on them like we use diamond blades now to cut rock and concrete.
But there is no evidence they had diamond on the edges.
Originally posted by Rocketman7
So I know our culture and our civilization is a civilization of complete idiots, but even a complete idiot might be able to see that someone drew in that stone while it was still wet.
Just sayin.
*Please edit the quoted portion to the salient material needed to make your point!
There is no need to repeat entire posts within the body of your response*
Originally posted by AGWskeptic
reply to post by Xtrozero
Do any of the pictures depict someone stonecutting?
All those depictions of everyday life, yet nobody making these amazing blocks.
You would think they would be proud of the achievement.
Originally posted by Xtrozero
Originally posted by AGWskeptic
reply to post by Xtrozero
Do any of the pictures depict someone stonecutting?
All those depictions of everyday life, yet nobody making these amazing blocks.
You would think they would be proud of the achievement.
Who knows, stone cutting might have been some low layman's position. It had to be grueling in any case...the actual cutting most likely was looked a pond as a low labor function.
Originally posted by Illustronic
I'd prefer a link so I can read it myself, I searched over 6 pages of this thread with zero verifications of dates.
That's not good. The basis they are using for dating relies on a cataclysmic flood they say happened 12,000 years ago, and there is no geological proof a flood like this occurred then. They then assume an additional 5,000 years before this flood is when these constructions occurred, that's pure conjecture.
If all of the ice melted on earth the sea level would rise an estimated 220 some feet. Tiwanaku, Bolivia is situated at an elevation of 3840 m (12600 feet). Most of the world ice is in Antarctica, up to 7,000 feet think, if all of the ice melted in Antarctica sea levels would rise about 200 feet, Greenland holds the second most world ice it would effect sea level about 20 more feet, ocean ice melt would have nominal effect on sea levels, and all land glacial ice would only contribute a couple feet if that. We are thousands of feet from the sea level ever reaching this site.
That dating method is not based in science, its based on mythology.
This land mass in Bolivia has no scientific proof that it was at a different altitude above sea level 12,000 years ago than it is now, and if it wasn't, a flood would be the least of the problems the area would have faced.
Originally posted by Illustronic
That's not good. The basis they are using for dating relies on a cataclysmic flood they say happened 12,000 years ago, and there is no geological proof a flood like this occurred then. They then assume an additional 5,000 years before this flood is when these constructions occurred, that's pure conjecture.
If all of the ice melted on earth the sea level would rise an estimated 220 some feet. Tiwanaku, Bolivia is situated at an elevation of 3840 m (12600 feet). Most of the world ice is in Antarctica, up to 7,000 feet think, if all of the ice melted in Antarctica sea levels would rise about 200 feet, Greenland holds the second most world ice it would effect sea level about 20 more feet, ocean ice melt would have nominal effect on sea levels, and all land glacial ice would only contribute a couple feet if that. We are thousands of feet from the sea level ever reaching this site.
That dating method is not based in science, its based on mythology.
This land mass in Bolivia has no scientific proof that it was at a different altitude above sea level 12,000 years ago than it is now, and if it wasn't, a flood would be the least of the problems the area would have faced.
Originally posted by AGWskeptic
Only in a high tech or academic community would stonework like that be considered lowly.
They were either primitive or they weren't.