Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel

reply to post by Xcathdra



Yeah and thanks for continuously EDITING your post AFTER I make a comment back.

Nice form....

reply to post by PaxVeritas


I liked the one where they voiced over , and put Hitlers voice, Im afraid our friend in his naivety has not been

exposed to Propaganda.

Xcath, research, Weapons of Mass Destruction., your Fox news you link will be a good place to start.

Originally posted by Tw0Sides

Originally posted by Xcathdra

Appeasement will not work in this case. We fought 2 world wars because of the mindset of its occurring there and its not my problem.

So your willing to take a chance of starting World War 3.

So you can stop the chance of World War 3.

You still dont get it do you. Its better and safer to risk a war now than down the road when they have nukes. Feel free to review history. Specifically check out WWII and Neville Chamberlain and Poland..

Appeasement was used by European democracies in the 1930s who wished to avoid war with the dictatorships of Germany and Italy, bearing in mind the horrors of the World War I. The term is most often applied to the foreign policy of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain towards Nazi Germany between 1937 and 1939.

His policies of avoiding war with Germany have been the subject of intense debate for seventy years among academics, politicians and diplomats. The historian's assessment of Chamberlain has ranged from condemnation for allowing Hitler to grow too strong, to the judgement that he had no alternative and acted in Britain's best interests.

At the time, these concessions were widely seen as positive, and the Munich Pact among Germany, Great Britain, France and Italy prompted Chamberlain to announce that he had secured "peace for our time".[4]

Is this not ringing a bell that the movie we are watching now with Iran is just the updated version from the 1930's?

Originally posted by PaxVeritas
reply to post by Xcathdra

 

Yeah and thanks for continuously EDITING your post AFTER I make a comment back.

Nice form....

I appologize for adding more information to support my argument. Next time I will refrain from doing that so your argument is not destroyed.

Way to jump to the wrong conclusion though.

nice form...

As far as your other inaccurate claims the info that you are "not seeing" is there. Simply ignoring it and claiming no one is showing you proof is also in bad form.

Originally posted by Tw0Sides
Xcath, research, Weapons of Mass Destruction., your Fox news you link will be a good place to start.

I already know what a WMD is. Its what Iran is trying to gain through obfuscation and stall tactics. Its the same tactic you are using by constantly going in circles with your argument while trying to derail the topic any chance you get.

A WMD is what Iran is working towards. Maybe you should head on over to Iran and explain it to them.

Originally posted by Xcathdra

Originally posted by PaxVeritas
reply to post by Xcathdra

 

Yeah and thanks for continuously EDITING your post AFTER I make a comment back.

Nice form....

I appologize for adding more information to support my argument. Next time I will refrain from doing that so your argument is not destroyed.

Way to jump to the wrong conclusion though.

nice form...

As far as your other inaccurate claims the info that you are "not seeing" is there. Simply ignoring it and claiming no one is showing you proof is also in bad form.

edit on 6-2-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)

Either post with the full intended information when debating with someone, or add in the next response.

You're editing posts AFTER the fact and adding content to them. People can't answer your posts clearly if you keep doing so.

Originally posted by Xcathdra

Originally posted by Tw0Sides
Xcath, research, Weapons of Mass Destruction., your Fox news you link will be a good place to start.

I already know what a WMD is. Its what Iran is trying to gain through obfuscation and stall tactics. Its the same tactic you are using by constantly going in circles with your argument while trying to derail the topic any chance you get.

A WMD is what Iran is working towards. Maybe you should head on over to Iran and explain it to them.

edit on 6-2-2012 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)

Another claim that Iran is working toward a WMD, meaning a Nuke?

PROVE THAT ONE.

Time, dates, place.

I'll forward the data to the DOD, Pentagon, and White House. Please let ATS and the general public know at once your exclusive findings. This is important breaking news.

Thank you.

Originally posted by Xcathdra

Is this not ringing a bell that the movie we are watching now with Iran is just the updated version from the 1930's?

Im thinking more of a movie we saw in 2003.

Weapons of Mass destruction 1 , Iraq

Weapons of Mass destruction 2 , Iran

Its the sequel.

reply to post by PaxVeritas


I added the videos. Had you read the entire post you would have known that.

Secondly, again, the reference sources have been listed. You ignored them because I directed you to wikipedia, bottom of the page, where all of the links to references / sources are

First reference - Ahmadinejad - wipe Israel off the map. Do the research then come back.. It will allow us to cut down on this stupid round robin of you demanding proof, getting the proof, realizing it undermines your position, and pretending like you never got the info in the first place.

Its the internet equivalent of wash rinse repeat except in your case its demand, receive, ignore.

what they are shouting in that video

marg bar Israel does not mean death to israel


marg bar literally translates to "death to," though it's typically meant as "down with

got it? like if I say i am dying here, I mean you are cracking me up, don't call 911.

reply to post by Xcathdra


And who would have thought, that ATS' own Xcathdra was an Israeli war propagandist? Really? Is Israel really that desperate that they're resorting to outright imaginary slander in order to create a need to invade Iran?

If not, then explain what this thread is, if not a BS excuse to try and get (ignorant) people up in arms and eager to attack a country that has done NOTHING to warrant an invasion?

Isnt that what this really is? Your attempt to piss people of without Iran having actually done ANYTHING?

Because...you know...they haven't done anything. What a fail thread.

Damn, the NeoCons are out in full force tonight over Iran and Syria!

It's ok everyone......grab your bug-out-bag and head to your designated safe area.

Once the Iranians, illegal immigrants and welfare queens have ravaged your town, the NeoCons will be by shortly after to escort you to your new home provided by FEMA!

Don't forget your weapons, as they would be gladly confiscated as WMD's and Karl Rove will be there to trade his autograph for each weapon you turn in!

reply to post by Xcathdra


You linked this video to show how evil this man is,

do you ever listen to your Facts, OR do you just go by the Title

In the video, he says Israel will be wiped out in a week, IF ISRAEL ATTACKS FIRST

reply to post by Xcathdra


One, you just admitted to adding videos AFTER you posted. That's not how it goes. You're supposed to edit and add content....THEN publish. Only edit for grammatical errors after the fact.

Two, the Wiipedia page has Pro and Con arguments on the "wipe israel off the map" issue. It's not MY position we're arguing, it's YOURS. You can;t make your case (multiple cases here) so you claim that I am not making mine.

Two things you need to prove.

1) Ahamadinejad categorically said "wipe Israel off the map"...with no room for error in interpretation and globally accepted as FACT

2) Prove that Iran is developing a Nuclear Weapon.

You have not proven either. Therefor I'm done here. You can continue with other posters claiming the same stuff but I've not been supplied by DE FACTO and EMPIRICAL evidence to your claims.

It's hot air and propaganda thus far on your part.

Originally posted by Tw0Sides
reply to post by Xcathdra

 

You linked this video to show how evil this man is,

do you ever listen to your Facts, OR do you just go by the Title

It's funny. He posts videos that show Ahmadinejad in the light of someone who is actually logical and isn't saying anything more 'outlandish' than the crap we've said (u.s. or Israel) and/or taken out of context.

It's almost like a...dare I say...Persian Ron Paul?? LOL

reply to post by PaxVeritas

There you go.. Its a real page turner..

IAEA report on Iran -
Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement and relevant provisions of Security Council resolutions in the Islamic Republic of Iran
Report by the Director General

Some of the highlights -

C.3. Other Enrichment Related Activities

27. The Agency is still awaiting a substantive response from Iran to Agency requests for further
information in relation to announcements made by Iran concerning the construction of ten new uranium
enrichment facilities, the sites for five of which, according to Iran, have been decided, and the construction
of one of which was to have begun by the end of the last Iranian year (20 March 2011) or the start of this
Iranian year.23,24 In August 2011, Dr Abbasi was reported as having said that Iran did not need to build
new enrichment facilities during the next two years.25 Iran has not provided information, as requested by
the Agency in its letter of 18 August 2010, in connection with its announcement on 7 February 2010 that it
possessed laser enrichment technology.26 As a result of Iran’s lack of cooperation on those issues, the
Agency is unable to verify and report fully on these matters.

E. Heavy Water Related Projects
29. Contrary to the relevant resolutions of the Board of Governors and the Security Council, Iran has not
suspended work on all heavy water related projects, including the construction of the heavy water
moderated research reactor, the Iran Nuclear Research Reactor (IR-40 Reactor), which is subject to
Agency safeguards.29

30. On 17 October 2011, the Agency carried out a DIV at the IR-40 Reactor at Arak and observed that
construction of the facility was ongoing and the coolant heat exchangers had been installed. According to
Iran, the operation of the IR-40 Reactor is planned to commence by the end of 2013.

31. Since its visit to the Heavy Water Production Plant (HWPP) on 17 August 2011, the Agency, in a
letter to Iran dated 20 October 2011, requested further access to HWPP. The Agency has yet to receive a
reply to that letter, and is again relying on satellite imagery to monitor the status of HWPP. Based on
recent images, the HWPP appears to be in operation. To date, Iran has not provided the Agency access to
the heavy water stored at the Uranium Conversion Facility (UCF) in order to take samples.30

G. Possible Military Dimensions - Its detailed so im not going to flood the text here.

reply to post by PaxVeritas

reply to post by Tw0Sides


Once again you didnt bother to listen to it all, or you just didnt understand it.

Time Index .30 seconds. Where the former Vice President of Iran stated Iran was a friend of Israels. He then retracted that statement and called for the destruction of Israel.

reply to post by Xcathdra



Awesome, you supplied ATS with detailed findings of a Uranium Enrichment program in Iran...according to the IAEA.

Groundbreaking stuff there. We need to call the Pentagon.