reply to post by hapablab
I am in no position to say either or about this, but one question bothers me, it's about that social security card, tell me why was it issued in
Connecticut? I am confused about that one.
It wasn't.
The SSN is a three field number, right? "xxx-yy-zzzz"
Once upon a time (it is not clear to me whether it is still the case or not), the SSA used the "xxx" field as a grouping number, to ensure that
numbers were not duplicated from one office to the other. You would not want one office, in California say, to issue the same number as another
office, in Iowa say. That would lead to all kinds of confusion about the taxpayers records.
Each State office had its own set of numbers so it didn't have to be constantly asking every other state if it had already used a number it was
proposing to use. This is clearly vitally important in the days before computers.
I believe by the time that Obama applied for his SSN, the State offices had already started to consolidate. Not every state had its own SSA office,
and any application could be processed in whatever office the applicant happened to send it to. Clearly, computers were taking their place and some
vital manual administration red tape was no longer so vital. However, the still continued to use the state grouping numbers (and may still to this
day, I am not completely clear on that).
So how could they determine what state grouping to use when a central office was processing applications from many states? Simple, they used the
applicants return address zip code as the key.
What is interesting here is that Obama's address in Hawai'i at the time (his grandparents address actually, but he lived with his grandparents) was in
zip code 96814 (in the intervening years zip codes have been added to Honolulu and the address is now in a different zip code 96826).
It is an interesting fact that while 96814 is in Honolulu Hawai'i (in 1976 when the SSN application was made), 06814 is in Hartford Connecticut.
There is another interesting fact that some folks don't realize. If you have sloppy handwriting and sort of leave off the tail of the '9' or loop it
too close to the circle part of the '9', you just might end up with something that looks all the world just like a '0'. Shocking, I know, but true.
Now please have a look at your keyboard. Notice that the key right next to the '9' key on the top row of alphabetic keypad is '0'. You may take it
from somebody who fought with a keypunch machine almost everyday in 1976, that that is exactly where the '0' and the '9' keys were on a 1976 keypunch.
In other words, all it took for the future President to get a Social Security Number with a State Grouping prefix from the Connecticut set was a fat
fingered keypunch operator to hit the wrong key, or to misread the number off the form.
The least interesting thing about the whole issue is that
it doesn't matter in the least. The grouping prefix has never been used for anything
what-so-ever except that single function of ensuring that duplicate numbers were not issued from different offices in the days before computers were
used to assign the numbers centrally. It was otherwise meaningless in the 1940's and it is even more meaningless today.
Can that be said enough times? The prefix, ostensibly from the Connecticut group, served no purpose other than to ensure that duplicate numbers were
not assigned, and today serve no purpose what-so-ever.
edit on 4/2/2012 by rnaa because: (no reason given)