It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
you don't think an alleged keypunch error on a social security card is odd?
Seems they'd check those pretty well.
Plus, if I recall (from memory, without proof) that he got his SSN when he was 15 to get a job at Baskin Robbins. Not sure why you mentioned the dates, have those changed since his birthdate?
The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence.
If I recall correctly John McCain is one of those candidates.
Or, like some are proposing here, they mixed up the zip code between Hawaii and Hartford. Kind of a stretch, I'd say, since their whole objective at the time was to get that right.
Originally posted by TopherWayne
He has nearly completed a full term as POTUS & my fellow ignorant Americans still can't stomach the fact that we have a half black President. That's what it all boils down to & we're going to have to hear it for four more years when he wins reelection.
Come on. At most she co-wrote one book on Photoshop 6 eleven years ago. There was nothing "official" about it—it was NOT published by Adobe.
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
I take faith in what Mara Zebest, the author of the Official Guidebook for PhotoShop
That's not what Minor says at all!!!
Originally posted by resist2012
Also, according to a supreme court ruling in 1875 in the case of Minor v. Happersett, it was deemed that the parents MUST BE US CITIZENS AT THE TIME OF BIRTH OF THE CHILD for the child to be a "NATURAL BORN" citizen.
So in Minor, the judge said "Some people find "natural born" to include people born here of non-citizen parents. People question that, but it is not the purpose of this case to resolve that particular issue.
At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. There were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.
Originally posted by spoor
Originally posted by Thermo Klein
Why in the world would you make such a ridiculous assumption?
Why do birthers make the ridiculous assumption Obama was not born in the USA?
The ridiculous assumption that he is not a natural born citizen?
The ridiculous assumption his birth certificates (both certified by the state of Hawaii) are fake?
The ridiculous assumption his SSN is fake, or was issued to someone else?
The ridiculous assumption he is a muslim?
The ridiculous assumption etc etc etc.
Originally posted by Snoopy1978
reply to post by rnaa
How come birthers didn't raise this big of astink about McCain being born in Panama? Please dont say race has nothing to do with this as your credibility drops to automatic hypocrisy.
Disclaimer: I do not support Obama, republicrats or any controlled opposition candidate in this fake choice people call "elections".
Originally posted by bekod
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
this part is the best part of the Judges statement from your linknow if they had a FBI or State record exp then maybe they could have been herd but then why no FBI or state because this is all "non Obama" smear.
A number of the witnesses who testified about the alleged fraud were never qualified as experts in birth records, forged documents and document manipulation and "none ... provided persuasive testimony," Malihi wrote.
edit on 4-2-2012 by bekod because: editting