It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No, not at all. The government isn't about protection your rights, YOU are about protecting your rights. The more power you put in the government's hands, the less of it you have. For ANY subject.
Well look, I'm not saying that I agree with senseless abortion. You should be made to keep your kid if there is no actual medical reason ( or otherwise) to ahve that done. What I'm saying is that the option NEEDS to be available to prevent some truly horrific and sad things from happening to women who feel like they have no way out.
This would hardly ever be the case. There isn't a large group of women who have serial abortions for the sake of fun...or being permiscuous.
My point is, the whole idea of telling somebody NO you can't do that, because I said so, even though this decision affects nobody but yourself; is insane.
There you go. Government interference in the lives of private citizens.
Of course, sometimes the interference can be justified, for example interference to prevent murder, rape or stealing. But its still interference (which is a neutral word in this context).
The default state of things without government intervention in the matter is pro-choice. Just like default state of things without government intervention in the matter of drugs is all drugs being allowed.
The thing about your pictures of dead babies is this: Most of them never lived. Most were amorphous biological matter that wouldn't have made it outside of the womb.
The only ones who want government intervention (government ban on something) are pro-lifers. No intervention means pro-choice, since thats the default state. Government restricts freedoms or leaves them alone, not gives them.
Originally posted by Gorman91
reply to post by tothetenthpower
Yes and that is the careful balance between individuals and government. But if you know anything about government, you'd know that you cannot 100% be an individual. That is called anarchy, and that does not work.
Feeling like they have no way out and actually having no way out are two different things. Unless they've been raped or they're going to die from having a kid, I really don't have any pity on those so desperate to kill a life.
Most abortions are done because of women who simply do not want the responsibility. It is an overall misused option that really has no legal reason to exist beyond life threatening conditions and where one's rights were violated.
it's not just"because I said so". But what you described is exactly what "law" is.
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by tothetenthpower
There have been over 50 million abortions since 1973. Are you stating that the majority of these were for medical reasons?
Seems to me that over 1 million abortions a year is more of an epidemic of convenience than any reasons medical.
Originally posted by relpobre000
reply to post by Gorman91
I think this is an argument of late-term vs. early term abortion. I wouldn't support a late term abortion as the child is already formed with functioning organ systems. Just because a child doesn't do anything 'particularly interesting' before the age of 4 doesn't mean I would support killing a 3 year old (at that point it is in fact murder).
But if you're against early term abortion you might as well be against masturbation.
Originally posted by Gorman91
Not everything deserves a choice. Especially abortion where it's just someone trying to undo their own mistake.]
Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by tothetenthpower
There have been over 50 million abortions since 1973. Are you stating that the majority of these were for medical reasons?
Seems to me that over 1 million abortions a year is more of an epidemic of convenience than any reasons medical.
There aren't stats to fall back on, so I don't really have an answer for you. It does seem kind of excessive. And I'm not saying that frivolous abortions don't happen, they do.
But you can't punish all of society for the actions of a few. That's like saying I can't borrow money anymore because the US has racked up such a bill...
~Tenth
Originally posted by beezzer
Justification for avoiding responsibiliy is NOT a valid reason for abortion.
Originally posted by paxnatus
By defending Roe vs. Wade, Obama upholds and advocates abortion, which is the same as destroying human
life. You see, this decision is more than a "woman's right to choose." It is the very words he chose, that speaks volumes about the President's integrity and moral values. To Obama, Pro Choice means not only that a
woman will not have to take responsibility if she was to get pregnant but she is free to commit murder if the pregnancy is inconvenient . After all, we would not want her to give up her dreams because she made a mistake.
After all, we would not want her to give up her dreams because she made a mistake.
Originally posted by PaxVeritas
Probably not. Stringent Pro Lifers usually only care about the child BEFORE it's breathing, and it's Mother is a Surrogate Heifer baby factory, only useful to procreate like a Queen Bee.