Originally posted by SuperTripps
Originally posted by Biliverdin
Originally posted by SuperTripps
reply to post by Biliverdin
What i dont know yet is what side were the templars on and still on today?
Seems to have been some splits there with rome but at same time templars were the bankers
What if french king was doing the right thing forthe people
Well if you look at what happened to the Cathars in France you would very quickly have the answer to that question.
everyone knows that story...there were also the teutonic knights and knights of malta/hospitalier
very easy to oversimplify
Yes, but Philip wasnt indebted to any of those groups, I don't see your point. There were a great number of orders, almost one for every state that
participated in the various crusades, and that was an expansive motion over a number of centuries. The very point of the crusades was to claim new
territories, and those claims led to new vassal states being created as reward for that service. Some of those gains were subsequently lost, and the
orders automatically and responsively contracted. The Templars however were formed as guardians of pilgrimage routes, not exclusively, but that
eventually became their primary role, and, as part of that role, they offered a credit system, that permitted pilgrims to deposit their possessions,
or cash, with the Templars at their point of departure, for which they were issued a letter of credit. On reaching their destination, they could then
redeem that letter of credt for the funds deposited. In doing so, they were protected from theft on their journey. It is likely, though I am not
well enough informed to confirm, that this was extended to some traders too. Additionally, they served as tax and tythe collectors for the Papal
lands in whichever territory they held. Hence why the Pope realised that backing Philip's persecution was a mistake, as many of the lands that the
Templars had protected for the Pope were lost to local lords and Kings.
The Templars ceased to exist, those who wished to remain in service to the Papacy, as warrior monks, or just as monks, were absorbed by the other
orders, most particularly the Order of St John, but many others were assimilated into the local laity and possibly, though again I do not know for
certain, formed the basis of professional armies independent of the Church, as well as passing their banking expertise onto those who had defended
and protected them.
I am sure that if you pop into your local library, or even search a little on-line you will be able to find historical sources that will enable you to
answer your own questions in more detail.
edit on 2-2-2012 by Biliverdin because: (no reason given)