It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Anim8tr
My suggestion to all of them is to form a group, fund a test flight, and prove or disprove once and for all.
I may try to provoke a response but a group hug isn't cutting it
I'll chip in a dollar or two. Imagine if just half a million people would do that, we would be up there taking samples in no time (and ending the endless chemtrail -real or hoax?- discussion). Because then we would have physical proof in our hands....if "they" let us is the big question.
Originally posted by JarredAus
but anyway there is an advert here in aus for virgin airlines... The end 5 to 10 seconds is a plane flying 'leaking' red and blue (virgins main colors?) its a 'normal' looking plane 747?? but everytime i saw the ad it trips me out.
The end 5 to 10 seconds is a plane flying 'leaking' red and blue (virgins main colors?) its a 'normal' looking plane 747??
Originally posted by Imagewerx
I don't know if this will make any difference or will actually be taken any notice of by the chemtrail believers,but here goes anyway.
When I was an aircraft spotting young teenager back in the early to mid 1970s,I used to spend all my summer holidays watching the nice clear blue skies over southern England (and we had PROPER summers even in the UK back in those days) with my binoculars and manual tuning Sharp AM airband receiver,so I had a pretty good idea what every contrail I saw was.I lived right underneath UR37 (Upper Red 37) as it was called then which was quite a busy airway,so I got used to seeing how contrails reacted over time.I soon got to learn from nothing more than using my own eyes that as the trails started to linger for longer and longer and became more persistent,the weather was about to change for the worse.Every time the day started and there were already lingering trails there when I woke up I knew there was a weather front approaching,and by the end of that day the sky would have gone from deep blue to manky grey and it'd be raining by the next day.
If a 13 year old schoolboy of average intelligence could work out just by using his eyes and a bit of common sense back in the pre-internet era that the approaching weather front caused the trails to be a LOT more persistent,and not the other way round where the trails caused the weather to change,then why can't grown up and more mature/intelligent adults also believe in such a simple concept? At that age I had an open mind (I still do actually) and didn't have my judgement of what was happening around me clouded (pardon the pun) by what I read on the internet,which from my own observations I'd have to guess at about 75% bull# or science fiction and the rest is science fact.
My dad who served as a fitter armourer in our FAA (Fleet Air Arm) in the second world war told me on many many occasions about the same thing over south east England as the Battle of Britain took place over head with Spitfires,Hurricanes,Messerschmits etc etc and the whole sky would be blotted out with countless hundreds of contrails going in every possible direction.
So I have empirical evidence that what are now believed by some people to be chemtrails that started in the 1990s were there some 20 years or more before this,and I even have the eyewitness account of someone with no reason to lie to me (he was a librarian and not a CIA shill) that they showed the exact same characteristics as today but a whole 70 years ago.That's a hell of discrepancy isn't it when according to the chemtrail believers,they only started "spraying" about 20 years ago.How do they explain in that case if back then they were just water vapour,how did they linger all day long without the chemicals we have to mix with them nowadays?
Originally posted by EarthChilde
reply to post by network dude
Same can be said for your side. It would only take a half million or so of you folks to create the same situation. Funny how when you are being outspoken you tend to forget that someone might just say 'Put YOUR money where your mouth is.' I have to believe that you folks would love to have the same scientific evidence fall to your favor so you can espouse the truth.
Originally posted by metalshredmetal
just because someone on an internet forum somewhere says that airplane exhaust is a "roll cloud" doesn't make it so.
there is clearly an airplane in that picture...that is clearly the airplane's exhaust.
I used your link to wiki to demonstrate that roll clouds and the more general arcus clouds are only made by nature, in natural processes.
an airplane's exhaust is not a process of nature and does no way create the same eolian processes which nature uses to produce arcus clouds.
this is why your picture is not of arcus/roll clouds. it is of airplane exhaust.