It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LordDrakula
I have no reason. I am just observing and learning what was and why and this is the most probable outcome.
Originally posted by Manhater
My Image
edit on 8-1-2012 by Manhater because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ColAngus
Originally posted by LordDrakula
I have no reason. I am just observing and learning what was and why and this is the most probable outcome.
What evidence exists to support a rogue planet being the most "probable" outcome?
Anything. Give me anything other than your mere hunch.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by LordDrakula
Earthquakes and volcanoes were not out of the ordinary last year. There is no connection to geological processes such as this and other celestial bodies outside of a few rare/uncommon low intensity quakes associated with the Moon.
Originally posted by ColAngus
reply to post by LordDrakula
Yeah, we're just going to have to agree to disagree. Personally, there is NOTHING there for anyone to see. It's all just in the interpretation, and if you want to get a rogue planet from that you will. There's just not any actual evidence of Nibiru.
But I would like to know at what point we can call this one DOA? I mean, the Destroyer has been on approach for decades now, and I'm sure we'll all need a breather after 2012. At least until Apophis-mania kicks up in 15 or so years.
So what's the expiration date on this myth?edit on 8-1-2012 by ColAngus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Manhater
reply to post by this_is_who_we_are
This isn't banter.
I don't believe in anything either.
I just keep an open mind. MUHAHA
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by LordDrakula
Earthquakes and volcanoes were not out of the ordinary last year. There is no connection to geological processes such as this and other celestial bodies outside of a few rare/uncommon low intensity quakes associated with the Moon.
Have 6.0 or greater earthquakes increased in number in the last 5 years compared to the number of 6.0 or greater earthquakes in last 20 years?
Originally posted by LordDrakula
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by LordDrakula
Earthquakes and volcanoes were not out of the ordinary last year. There is no connection to geological processes such as this and other celestial bodies outside of a few rare/uncommon low intensity quakes associated with the Moon.
Have 6.0 or greater earthquakes increased in number in the last 5 years compared to the number of 6.0 or greater earthquakes in last 20 years?
Is this enough for you ?? :
Originally posted by this_is_who_we_are
- PS
In case you missed it while arguing distractions and minutia:
6.6 near Solomon Islands just minutes ago...