It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by tothetenthpower
So let me get this straight...
You jumped on me about the founding fathers and the constitution being outdated but you try to justify homosexuality by saying it was acceptable before Christians came along thousands of years ago???
You've gotta think about these posts more before you press "reply".
Are you beginning to see how indefensible your position is yet?
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Why the hell do I have to live under the rule of an idiot mass who buys into either flavors of this trash?
An act in 1628 forbade marriages“without lycence or asking in
church.” In 1632, in the same group
of acts that empowered church
wardens to collect penalties of one
shilling for each unexcused absence
from church and that required ministers
to preach one sermon every
Sunday, it was stated that “noe
mynister shall celebrate matrymony
betweene any persons without a
facultie or lycense graunted by the
Governor except the banes of
matrymony have beene first published
three severall Sondayes or
holidayes” in a church located where
the parties lived. The act forbade
marriages to be performed “at any
unseasonable tymes,
Also in 1632, an
act was passed requiring all preaching,
administration of communion,
baptizing of children and marriages
to be performed in the church,
“except in cases of necessitie.” [The
Statutes at Large; Being a Collection
of all the Laws of Virginia, Volume I,
by William Waller Hening, 1823.]
Laws pertaining to punishment
of indentured servants who married
in secret without the permission of
their master or widowed mistress
(implication being that if the master
were alive, the mistress’s consent
alone was not acceptable)–
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
There's a major problem with that, and if you happen to run into a candidate ask them this :
"To ban sodomy in the US is to violate the 1st Amendment's clause of "The US has no Official State Religion would be a direct violation of The Constitution and what do you plan to do to ensure that the seperation of Church and State remains?"!
People lie down when Religion demands it but in reality if you are having oral or anal with the person you swore in front of God to spend the rest of your life with where is the problem? It's when you deny it to married couples does one or both begin to wander and stray outside of the marriage to get it. Allow it in marriage and you could reduce broken homes and divorce by more then 2/3! Couples would stay together longer and monogyny would be the new norm.
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
The sad reality and truth is that there is a group whose goal is to get policies like this reimplemented while tossing out our current legal system in favour of a theocratic system.
Originally posted by BubbaJoe
Republicans have bashed everyone for restricting their constitutional rights, however they are all for controlling or making unlawful what goes on in my bedroom. I do not understand this, if the sex act is between two consenting adults, where does anyone get off telling me I can't do it. This has got me totally baffled, if I was not trying to be politically correct on here, I would tell you what I truly think. Rick Santorum winning Iowa, and he believes that sodomy and birth control are things that should be outlawed, WTF, he and his wife have never had oral sex, and if that is the freaking case, I feel sorry for both of them. Get the hell out of my GD bedroom, and fix the freaking government of this country. HFS
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by Fromabove
Obviously The GOP does or else the reason for this thread wouldn't be needed!
Originally posted by TheImmaculateD1
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Isn't that what the offering plate is for? A backdoor membership fee, ie, keep on paying and you'll get all the back and support you need, offer nothing and get nothing!
Besides, everyone should be aware of the fact that you ARE TO NOT pay for spiritual healing and spiritual protections as it's all FREE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!edit on 4-1-2012 by TheImmaculateD1 because: (no reason given)
Are you arguing argumentum ad ignorantiam?