It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
How two cycles that are completely irrelevant to one another, regardless of their ancientness and usage of pyramids, equals an irrelevant sum of God/infinity/love/etc is beyond me.
Originally posted by Confusion42
I agree with you.
To the OP - Your Math is incorrect.
You fail to answer simple questions.
When a poster informed the OP that the Sumerians had Cuneiform, and that Hieroglyphics came from the Egyptians, you provided a link to a the wiki on Sumeria. The wiki on Sumeria does NOT mention Hieroglyphics, the word does not even appear in the entry.
It appears the OP might be delusional; I say this because of your insulting nature towards the people that have shown your code to be a bunch of hogwash.
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
I agree with mOjOm's post as well. However, the OP's math is not incorrect, let's not allow cherry-picking. I just feel that it is irrelevant to the supposed "sum".
Originally posted by Destiny777
reply to post by Confusion42
Actually, the math is correct my friend, but, THANK YOU FOR AGREEING!!!
LOVE YA...17.7777777(infinity)
Originally posted by mOjOm
Ok, let's take it again from the top shall we?? Cause I think some things need to be made clear.
These are your starting values:
Fibonacci Code: 64 cubes to create spiral
Mayan Cycle: 26,000 years
Sumerian Cycle: 3,600 years
So, first of all, where are you getting 64 cubes creating a spiral from???
How is that a Fibonacci code???
What is the relationship you are talking about between "64 cubes" and the "Fibonacci Number Sequence"???
(So you know, I'm very, very familiar with the Fib sequencing of numbers and it's patterns and relationships with phi so be very clear about your answer here please.)
Next, are your calculations:
64,000/3600= 17.7777777(infinity)
Then take the 26,000 Year Mayan Cycle and Divide it by the 3600 year Sumerian cycle = 7.2222222(Infinity)
Why did you go from 64 to 64,000???
Why are you dividing the Sumerian cycle into the Mayan Cycle and also into the 64,000??? What is their relationship to each other??? (ie. The Mayan Precession of the Equinoxes and the Sumerian Cycle of 3600 years and their relationship to whatever the 64000 number represents)
Please understand, I don't have a problem with your math as it's very simple math, but what I don't get and what you haven't yet explained, as far as I can tell, is where you're getting your additional meanings for these numbers.
Can you explain the meanings you attribute to these numbers???
How do they equate to "Unconditional Love" and so on???
Originally posted by Destiny777
Originally posted by OzTiger
I hope I am not throwing a spanner into the works here but the Sumerian 3,600 year cycle is surely the myth figure of one Zecharia Sitchin isn't it?
Sitchins translations have been proven wrong.
Sorry again.
LOL...
No. Not to do with Zecharia Sitchin. Where on earth would you get that?
Secondly, WHO PROVED this man wrong? Are you saying that just because a certain "scholar," disagreed with another that all is debunked? That denotes limited thinking my friend.
LOVE YA...
Originally posted by seachange
Originally posted by Destiny777
If you HATE anything, then I wouldn't expect you to understand this. To the negative, positivity is evil...for obvious reasons...
If someone seems to have a loving, caring, kind, caring, generous attitude, then then about once a month decides he hates one thing, does that make him a negative person? That's what you've implied. Stereotyping is negative, not positive.
As I imagine has been apparently pointed out several times: The base 10 number system is not that great because it increases the number of awkward decimal places in fractional numbers when compared to other number systems. So instead of carefully considering my level of various personal characteristics I suggest you instead focus on the actual points of my posting about your choice of base.
And again, since you like 7 so much, how about base 7 for your number system? If I can learn base 7, then so can you. Is 23 and 10/12ths (base 7) a number that you find unappealing?
Originally posted by Destiny777
Pie =3.14
Square root of PI = 17720045 (interesting enough, the square root of Pi's first two numbers are 17)
......
..... is ABSOLUTE STUPIDITY.....
Originally posted by vogon42
Originally posted by seachange
Originally posted by Destiny777
If you HATE anything, then I wouldn't expect you to understand this. To the negative, positivity is evil...for obvious reasons...
If someone seems to have a loving, caring, kind, caring, generous attitude, then then about once a month decides he hates one thing, does that make him a negative person? That's what you've implied. Stereotyping is negative, not positive.
As I imagine has been apparently pointed out several times: The base 10 number system is not that great because it increases the number of awkward decimal places in fractional numbers when compared to other number systems. So instead of carefully considering my level of various personal characteristics I suggest you instead focus on the actual points of my posting about your choice of base.
And again, since you like 7 so much, how about base 7 for your number system? If I can learn base 7, then so can you. Is 23 and 10/12ths (base 7) a number that you find unappealing?
I have brought up different number bases to OP before, I don't believe his understanding of numbers goes that far. At least in the past these questions have been avoided, or answered with some belittling BS. (as anyone with a lack of understanding would do)
I really feel all this post means is you can pull any number out of your butt and tell people it represents something.
Originally posted by OzTiger
Originally posted by Destiny777
Originally posted by OzTiger
I hope I am not throwing a spanner into the works here but the Sumerian 3,600 year cycle is surely the myth figure of one Zecharia Sitchin isn't it?
Sitchins translations have been proven wrong.
Sorry again.
LOL...
No. Not to do with Zecharia Sitchin. Where on earth would you get that?
Secondly, WHO PROVED this man wrong? Are you saying that just because a certain "scholar," disagreed with another that all is debunked? That denotes limited thinking my friend.
LOVE YA...
Sitchins "3,600" year cycle was supposed to be about the Annunaki Planet, Nibiru, orbiting earth every 3,600 years - according to his translations. Michael Heiser, a scholar in Sumerian, Hebrew and Aramaic has gone into great detail (in layman's terms) describing Sitchin's mistakes in translation which was a combination of taking things out of context, bad grammar and sheer, unadulterated fantasy.
I am not disagreeing entirely with your theories but on the Sumerian 'cycle' you are relying on the word of one man who, on the one hand has given some intriguing insight into the Sumerian Tablets, but on the other has gone a little 'over the top' to say the least. There have been many to disprove Sitchins 'Nibiru' theories but none who have come up with any evidence substantiating his findings.
Love you too - have a nice day my friend.
Originally posted by 1010011010
reply to post by Destiny777
Your wiki link doesn't lead to anywhere interesting/important/helpful/etc and you CAN NOT just play with decimal points as you please. It changes the whole deal. You should know that since you claim to be a good mathematician.edit on 24-12-2011 by 1010011010 because: (no reason given)
EDIT: Also, it is not true that "all it does is change decimal points and adds zeroes". Falling from heights of 1 meter and 1000 meters is not the same thing.edit on 24-12-2011 by 1010011010 because: (no reason given)
I can't??? It looks like I just did...
LOVE YA...17.7777777(infinity)
Originally posted by 1010011010
I can't??? It looks like I just did...
LOVE YA...17.7777777(infinity)
That is an answer I would have expected from a twelve year old. The fact that you did that does not prove that it is mathematically valid. And why exactly have you chosen 64 000? You could have gone with 640 000 or 6 400 but you chose 64 000.
Have you got a good reason for that or have you chosen it just because it fits your "code"?
I'm starting to think that you are just a troll who has too much time on his hands.
\\
Originally posted by Destiny777
Originally posted by vogon42
Originally posted by seachange
Originally posted by Destiny777
If you HATE anything, then I wouldn't expect you to understand this. To the negative, positivity is evil...for obvious reasons...
If someone seems to have a loving, caring, kind, caring, generous attitude, then then about once a month decides he hates one thing, does that make him a negative person? That's what you've implied. Stereotyping is negative, not positive.
As I imagine has been apparently pointed out several times: The base 10 number system is not that great because it increases the number of awkward decimal places in fractional numbers when compared to other number systems. So instead of carefully considering my level of various personal characteristics I suggest you instead focus on the actual points of my posting about your choice of
base.
And again, since you like 7 so much, how about base 7 for your number system? If I can learn base 7, then so can you. Is 23 and 10/12ths (base 7) a number that you find unappealing?
I have brought up different number bases to OP before, I don't believe his understanding of numbers goes that far. At least in the past these questions have been avoided, or answered with some belittling BS. (as anyone with a lack of understanding would do)
I really feel all this post means is you can pull any number out of your butt and tell people it represents something.
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by 1010011010
I can't??? It looks like I just did...
LOVE YA...17.7777777(infinity)
That is an answer I would have expected from a twelve year old. The fact that you did that does not prove that it is mathematically valid. And why exactly have you chosen 64 000? You could have gone with 640 000 or 6 400 but you chose 64 000.
Have you got a good reason for that or have you chosen it just because it fits your "code"?
I'm starting to think that you are just a troll who has too much time on his hands.
Originally posted by Destiny777
reply to post by 1010011010
Please...find all of those instances you're referring to and post them on your next reply. I'd LOVE to see it. There have been only 3 people that this would apply, because I looked at the whole thread just to be sure. 3 people who took the same approach as YOU. Every single person who asked the first time, with genuine curiosity as opposed to degrading the thread "NAMECALLING," (like yourself) got a straightforward answer...including yourself. Its not until the attacks begin do I point out the flaws in their logic and then show them that its a case of their ego. THEY WANT TO WIN...very much like YOU want to WIN. You consider it a challenge...I don't. I consider it to be...well, SILLY.
Now...would you like the MODS to look this over and see WHO has been aggressive to WHOM? Because the best thing about threads is the fact that every SINGLE response is tracked, and you can see who is behaving "out of line," very easy. I think you might want to go back and check things again, because, if you did...you will clearly see who has created the negativity, and who returned that negativity with LOVE.
LOVE YA...17.7777777(infinity)
Now...would you like the MODS to look this over and see WHO has been aggressive to WHOM?
Originally posted by Destiny777
reply to post by 1010011010
THEY WANT TO WIN...very much like YOU want to WIN. You consider it a challenge...I don't. I consider it to be...well, SILLY.
Now...would you like the MODS to look this over and see WHO has been aggressive to WHOM? Because the best thing about threads is the fact that every SINGLE response is tracked, and you can see who is behaving "out of line," very easy. I think you might want to go back and check things again, because, if you did...you will clearly see who has created the negativity, and who returned that negativity with LOVE.
LOVE YA...17.7777777(infinity)
Originally posted by ErroneousDylan
I am aware that these two civilizations are both ancient and both had pyramids, but how are they relevant to one another? Calendar/planet=love?
Originally posted by Destiny777
Pie =3.14
Square root of PI = 17720045 (interesting enough, the square root of Pi's first two numbers are 17)