It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pianopraze
reply to post by TheBigDuke
Sure thing:
reply to post by subcsailor
TY,
I hope many people will use this thread for reference when refuting lens flare "UFO's" in the future
Originally posted by lacrimosa
reply to post by pianopraze
thread title confuse's thing's a little i think.
Originally posted by Destiny777
reply to post by pianopraze
Good for you. Now maybe you should find something constructive to do with your time other than trying to replicate UFO photographs.
Sometimes I wonder...
Originally posted by BULLETINYOURHEAD
Well I geuss you didn't then, why even ? bother
Originally posted by nh_ee
in actuality it is a UFO until it is Identified.
categorically speaking all of these pictures until identified are for that matter.
This example is lacking in detail for one and would lead one to believe that it could be a lens artifact and not a solid object or craft.
But in this case, called Lens Flare their needs to be a source of light in which to be reflected.
If a picture doesn't have provide a light source for every object then Lens Flare can be thrown out in many cases.
There is no harm in claiming that something as being Unidentified if you honestly do not understand what it is though.
And one shouldn't worry about what others think of you if you do !
For those so adamant about the prevalence of so called fake images being mistaken as alien craft.
Simply provide evidence as to why they are not....or use the scroll wheel and move on.
Plain and Simple.
Peace