It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by L00kingGlass
I like how you phrased that "Fire them" that's perfect. They work for us. Not the other way around.
Better word usage than 'overthrow' or 'Coup'
Originally posted by Jason88
reply to post by sonnny1
Ha. I do know you. And I will not defend myself because of your fears, ask for some clarification from someone you trust before posting nonsense. Next time you try to pigeonhole someone with mind games, please understand context before it bites you on the behind. And then, read and re-read and then read some more why that comparison was made.edit on 12-11-2011 by Jason88 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jason88
I hear ya. Maybe the remedy is just like the mid-east terrorists (again not supporting, just a good comparison in my mind) --- and that is to have a whole chain of command, that is hidden, so if one leader goes down, another pops up in another city, and on and on and on.
Terrorism is the systematic use of terror, especially as a means of coercion. In the international community, however, terrorism has no universally agreed, legally binding, criminal law definition. Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for a religious, political or ideological goal, and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (civilians). Some definitions now exclude acts of state terrorism and some also include acts of unlawful violence and war. The use of similar tactics by criminal organizations for protection rackets or to enforce a code of silence is usually not labeled terrorism though these same actions may be labeled terrorism when done by a politically motivated group.
Originally posted by yourmaker
Originally posted by IofRa
Anything you try to solve with violence is a lost cause.
Remain peaceful, folks. This will only turn against them.
Then why is it acceptable for our government to use?
On other nations and it's own citizenry?
And if that were the case, why do we give them consent?
And if we don't give them our consent, then we would be slaves, no?
we are slaves to violence in the name of peace.
As soon as a firearm is fired and real blood spilt with loss of life. That will be the moment the police need to really start cracking skulls.
You guys are like Joe Paterno.
Originally posted by Resinveins
reply to post by neo96
Hmm attacked the israeli consulate.. pretty sure they occupied the lobby.. for like 20 minutes.. then they left... that's an attack to you? Are you twisting things to your advantage here?