It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by disiswhoitb
Everybody wake up! The governments in Great Britain, France and USA are not in control. Israel controls all of them with an iron fist. Israel will strike and BOOM! All 3 of those countries will be at war with Iran.
Originally posted by disiswhoitb
Everybody wake up! The governments in Great Britain, France and USA are not in control. Israel controls all of them with an iron fist. Israel will strike and BOOM! All 3 of those countries will be at war with Iran. People need to accept reality, we have no control over the governments decision to go to war. That's why the approval rating of congress is around 11-13%. The only decision we can make is not to go fight in these fraudulent wars.
Originally posted by Suffi
I'm no expert on war but the preparation will be for an all out war and not a single strike. Because an attack on Iran facilities could initiate all out war.
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by Suffi
I'm no expert on war but the preparation will be for an all out war and not a single strike. Because an attack on Iran facilities could initiate all out war.
Not necessarily.
Israel bombed Iraq's nuclear facility at Osirak near Baghdad in 1981........that didn't lead to "all out war".
news.bbc.co.uk...
edit on 3-11-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by princeofpeace
The only difference is that the strikes on Iraq (and on Syria's reactor a few years ago) were that they struck one target. What would be done to Iran would look like all out bombardment because Israel would have to hit many targets thorughout the country as Iran's program is dispersed in more than a few locations. Combine that with also having to eliminate defense posts around those sites and we're talking about an air campaign that would look like all out war. Not just a single surgical strike on a reactor.
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by Suffi
I'm no expert on war but the preparation will be for an all out war and not a single strike. Because an attack on Iran facilities could initiate all out war.
Not necessarily.
Israel bombed Iraq's nuclear facility at Osirak near Baghdad in 1981........that didn't lead to "all out war".
news.bbc.co.uk...
edit on 3-11-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jhn7537
I do believe that any strike on Iran, whether it being from UK, US or Isreal would lead to full out war... There is so little to gain with this conflict (if it happens) and there is so much to lose......I hope that these governments can talk out the issues and differences without a shot being fired.......
Originally posted by jhn7537
Well if there was a US stike on Iran's nuclear facilities, bases, etc... Do you think that Iran would just do nothing or retaliate?
Originally posted by jhn7537
reply to post by Logical one
Doesnt Iran have Subs (I think nuclear) in the Atlantic Ocean, close to the coast of the United States? They could easily hit our coast with missles from there, right?
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by jhn7537
reply to post by Logical one
Doesnt Iran have Subs (I think nuclear) in the Atlantic Ocean, close to the coast of the United States? They could easily hit our coast with missles from there, right?
What exactly have you been reading!
Iran doesn't have nuclear submarines...........and any submarines that they do have are unlikely to be much theat to the US.
If you are into action movies.......then yeah it makes for a good movie.
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by jhn7537
reply to post by Logical one
Doesnt Iran have Subs (I think nuclear) in the Atlantic Ocean, close to the coast of the United States? They could easily hit our coast with missles from there, right?
What exactly have you been reading!
Iran doesn't have nuclear submarines...........and any submarines that they do have are unlikely to be much theat to the US.
If you are into action movies.......then yeah it makes for a good movie.
Originally posted by ChrisF231
With what? Bliar, Brown, and Cameron have destroyed the British military ...
The British Army barely has enough troops to mount the Changing of the Guard at Buckingham Palace much less to attack Iran. The Royal Navy has no aircraft carriers now. The RAF lost half their fighters last fall.edit on 2-11-2011 by ChrisF231 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jhn7537
Ive been reading threads on ATS...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
It will be paid for by the US if it happens, just like always. Other countries never do their part and then they take the money and hate us for lifting their load. We can't afford this anymore. Time for the UK and others to do their part and pay themselves while they leave us out of it. This must be Obama's idea to get himself elected.