It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

House Democrats Endorse ' Occupy Wall Street'

page: 5
18
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:01 PM
link   
reply to post by mastahunta
 


what the op about?

it aint fox news nice deflections from tupac,outkast,and you and spyder change the narrative of the thread about something it isnt,

they call that trolling
edit on 10-10-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:02 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


All of the corporate media is the issue, not just the one that wears your colors. MSNBC, ABC, CNN, FOX, CBS, screw them all. They are all propaganda factories, I don't say "Fox News sucks!", then turn on CNN and drool while I mindlessly absorb what they air.

Come on neo, we've discussed this same topic before and I told you the same thing.

Sorry for steering off topic though. I just kinda followed the flow of the conversation, and here I am talking about mainstream media and Ron Paul.
edit on 10-10-2011 by TupacShakur because: To edit my post



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:03 PM
link   
What about the OP?

People can just turn on Fox News for that, that is where you get your thoughts anyways.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:07 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Ok, let's talk about your OP.


House Democrates (People you hate) endorse OWS (A movement you hate)....what would you like to discuss about that?



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by neo96
 


Ok, let's talk about your OP.


House Democrates (People you hate) endorse OWS (A movement you hate)....what would you like to discuss about that?


He wants to vomit on it enough times as to make sure the acid dissolves the existence of both.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:16 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


yeah lets talk about the op

endorsed by liberals
supported by liberals
the only people who have problems with fox news

and the only people who have problems with what i say

if it looks like a duck it quacks like a duck its a liberal duck.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:17 PM
link   
I'm finding it hilarious how the Liberals are crying over how Conservatives will view the OWS protests given the way they treat the Tea Party protests.

Like the Tea Party they had a chance to make a stand, to speak on the issues, to make a change. Like the Tea Party they opted not to have a leader (stupidity) and will be consumed by the DNC as the TP was consumed by the GOP. OWS deserves the ridicule and slander coming its way because it should have learned from it's predecessors.

They want to be like Egypt.


Ask the families of the 29 dead today at the hands of the Egyptian military council how that leaderless "Revolution" is working.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:19 PM
link   
reply to post by TupacShakur
 


who cares what news says are people not free to believe and watch whatever they want to?

i dont have a problem with that i compare to all the anti news corporate rants on here as akin to fascist nazis book burning.

these posts those shows are nothing but thoughts and words given form much like a book kill what you dont want to hear and have one course of dialogue.

you people are free to say whatever you want i could careless but i still reserve the right to disagree with it.
edit on 10-10-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:19 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


I have no issue with calling OWS a liberal movement.

And I 100% hope that it becomes a left wing "Tea Party".


Soooooo...what's your point? Is that a bad thing? Can the left wing not have a movement of their own to speak out and let it be known what they want?

Do you hate freedom? Do you only want people to have a movement if it matches your opinion?



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:20 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


the left wing already has their movement sitting in the senate and the oval office

we dont need more of the same.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


the left wing already has their movement sitting in the senate and the oval office

we dont need more of the same.


So it's true...you don't want people to have a voice unless it's opinions you agree with.


How freedom loving of you.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:25 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


words are cheap their voice is accomplishing just what exactly?

oh i know the same things that put them in power and and put us where we are and there they are screaming with their voices WE WANT MORE YES WE CAN screw ourselves even more.
edit on 10-10-2011 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:29 PM
link   
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


The left-wing has nothing to complain about? They gave us Obama, had 2 years to shove draconian fascist policies down our throats, still control 2/3rds of the government and is responsible for essentially everything they are bitching about...

So what's the point? Stupid, aimless, confused and blind college kids screaming about how mad they are, still living in mommy's house without a care in the World.

That's how I'm coming to perceive these people.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by OutKast Searcher
 


The left-wing has nothing to complain about? They gave us Obama, had 2 years to shove draconian fascist policies down our throats, still control 2/3rds of the government and is responsible for essentially everything they are bitching about...

So what's the point? Stupid, aimless, confused and blind college kids screaming about how mad they are, still living in mommy's house without a care in the World.

That's how I'm coming to perceive these people.


Exactly the method in a two party system of control

Exactly why liberals were led to perceive the TP as a crowd of fascist, snowbird, racists...


www.abovetopsecret.com...

In the end nothing can be done because it is just too easy to get you (for example)
to think that stupid, aimless, confused and blind college kids are threatening you
more than the two party system and the overall, corrupt political system.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:36 PM
link   
reply to post by mastahunta
 


Do you know what's really .. really .. incredibly effing stupid?

Comments like yours.

There is a difference between Liberals and Conservatives. It is not imaginary, there is no secret hand forcing us against each other.. it's about ideology.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:54 PM
link   
Left/Right/Left/Right/left/Right/Left/Right.

I am beginning to think I am in Basic Training.
This is so sad.

If I were a conspiracy minded person I would think that this thread was filled with trolls or disinfo agents. or both. This thread and general topic has become so polarizing that the people on either end of the pole are blinded and can't see their own hand in front of their face.

It takes a big man to admit he is wrong.
It would just make my day to see some of these hard core polarized people back away from their positions and come to center and admit they are wrong.

But I don't see it happening and won't hold my breath.
Are there any big men here?



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 02:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Screwed
 


Yea it's weird how many people have such off kilt opinions, I keep wondering what's up myself.

Are people really like this? Or is this a trick?

Sometimes I get crazy about something as well, but I'm not about to defend a stupid concept to death.



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 03:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rockpuck
reply to post by mastahunta
 


Do you know what's really .. really .. incredibly effing stupid?

Comments like yours.

There is a difference between Liberals and Conservatives. It is not imaginary, there is no secret hand forcing us against each other.. it's about ideology.


Maybe I'm wrong, how about that?

Does that change the fact that the Tea Party and OWS are being dealt with in the same manner?'

I suppose your perfection and my stupidity trump reality...
edit on 10-10-2011 by mastahunta because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 04:00 PM
link   
Just read this excellent article about OWS and has highlighted some of my concerns about the movement.



I found the occupiers had the same totalitarian attitude, though they don’t see it as totalitarian. Yes, their loving acceptance of those who disagree with them is astonishing, but it’s totalitarian. It asks that people give up their individuality to the state the occupiers are creating. Rather than free speech, the protest has a sort of "managed speech" to make sure everyone has equal time. There is also the flip side, that not to join the movement or to disagree with the protesters means that you are working against the interest of the people.


The author goes on to argue this type of thinking was prominent during the French Revolution.


The protesters have been settling on the idea that the conflict is the 99% against the 1%. But since the country is evenly divided between Democrat and Republican, they represent, at best, the interests of 50% against the 1%. No matter how poor, Republicans don’t see socialism as being in their own interests. Instead of chanting "We are the 99%" they should be chanting "We are the 50%", but they seem immune to seeing things from this perspective.


Worth a read

erratasec.blogspot.com...



posted on Oct, 10 2011 @ 04:21 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


They claim that there is not suppose to be any politics or elected officials involved. Doesn't sound like it does it? Suppose to be all colors and all ideas all faiths? Apparently not anymore. I started out hoping this would be a real movement of the people, by the people and for the people. That was before the bought and paid for professionals arrived on the scene. Why do you think there was no MSM coverage until they got into place and now it is going viral. The only thing changed were the players. Al Gore called for a US Arab Spring about 2 weeks before the protests began. Ad Busters set it up. SEIU had a meeting at the White House in August along with Acorn. Now the founder of OTPOR (CIA) Ivan Marovic whose organization was key in the Serbian War during the 1990's and known to have been sponsored and handled by William Montgomery who later became US Ambassador to Serbia after the war. Mr. Marovic has rode into town to organize OWS protest. With all of this the main stream steam has been captured and is being turned into support Obama for re-election. Which is to undermine everything the protestors are clamoring for or at least claim to be protesting for. Where does this leave all of the people who want and demand real change and real accountability? Scr%%ed totally Scr%%ed!



new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 2  3  4    6  7  8 >>

log in

join