People Who Pronounce and Spell the Name of Jesus In Weird Old Testament Variants are Going to Hell

reply to post by akushla99

You really do have a gall, guessing my answer, based on your interpretation of what I am saying, based on responses to the OP.

Suite yourself but i see no reason for you coming on this thread other than to insult me. There, you had your episode of judgment and hate, so just don't concern yourself with things you find irrelevant to yourself, or according to your belief, anyone.

Originally posted by akushla99
reply to post by notalemming

 

Cheers notalemming

Akushla

Cheers and congratulating yourselves for not even understanding anything about the thread and jumping into a discussion about nothing you believe in, just to have a gloating ego fix.

Originally posted by jmdewey60

Originally posted by akushla99
reply to post by notalemming

 

Cheers notalemming

Akushla

Cheers and congratulating yourselves for not even understanding anything about the thread and jumping into a discussion about nothing you believe in, just to have a gloating ego fix.

Cheers jmdewey

I return the LOVE...

Akushla

Originally posted by jmdewey60

Originally posted by akushla99
reply to post by notalemming

 

Cheers notalemming

Akushla

Cheers and congratulating yourselves for not even understanding anything about the thread and jumping into a discussion about nothing you believe in, just to have a gloating ego fix.

Please stop embarrassing yourself and Christ whom you are meant to be representing. You are bringing shame upon Christ with your behavior. I appeal to you as a brother in Christ.

I am now praying for you, please don't take this as an insult but rather receive this as a warning.

reply to post by XplanetX

please don't take this as an insult

Huh, no kidding?
Well, thanks for your insightful contribution on the topic.

Originally posted by daikaiju

Originally posted by Caji316
Constitene made this name up out of the 100 gods there were back then. it is Chrisna and Zeuse. No power at all in it. No more than tom and steve.

Who? Can you please check your spelling before making a post, this makes no sense.

sheesh..... You know emperor Constantine of Ancient Rome, he was the guy that introduced Christianity.
Not that difficult to follow.

Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by XplanetX

 

please don't take this as an insult

Huh, no kidding?
Well, thanks for your insightful contribution on the topic.

I have already provided a substantial contribution to the topic using scripture, something that is sorely lacking from yourself.


MT 18:2 He called a little child and had him stand among them. And he said: "I tell you the truth, unless you change and become like little children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Therefore, whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.

reply to post by XplanetX

I have already provided a substantial contribution to the topic using scripture, something that is sorely lacking from yourself.

Most of the scripture you quoted in this thread was in order to personally insult me, such as the sort of thing you are doing now. You have never gotten past this idea that the topic is about a language barrier between cultures.
Hebrew was not a living language in the time of Jesus. Modern Hebrew was invented to be the official state language of Israel. So, using Hebrew in the New Testament has no legitimate use, since it was not used in Jesus' time and New Testaments are burnt in Israel. The only purpose of using Hebrew to substitute in for words in the New Testament is to subvert the religion and to create a new Judaized version of Christianity, leading people back to the old covenant of Sinai that Jesus died to ransom us from and to inaugurate the New Covenant.
I understand you have no use for the New Covenant because you believe that Jesus died to satisfy the Old covenant, so you could not care less if Christianity is subverted, since you already follow such a version now.

reply to post by Raivan31

You know emperor Constantine of Ancient Rome, he was the guy that introduced Christianity.

He officiated over the first ecumenical council back in 324 or thereabouts, so Christianity had been around for some time before he got involved.

Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by XplanetX

 

I have already provided a substantial contribution to the topic using scripture, something that is sorely lacking from yourself.

Most of the scripture you quoted in this thread was in order to personally insult me, such as the sort of thing you are doing now. You have never gotten past this idea that the topic is about a language barrier between cultures.
Hebrew was not a living language in the time of Jesus. Modern Hebrew was invented to be the official state language of Israel. So, using Hebrew in the New Testament has no legitimate use, since it was not used in Jesus' time and New Testaments are burnt in Israel. The only purpose of using Hebrew to substitute in for words in the New Testament is to subvert the religion and to create a new Judaized version of Christianity, leading people back to the old covenant of Sinai that Jesus died to ransom us from and to inaugurate the New Covenant.
I understand you have no use for the New Covenant because you believe that Jesus died to satisfy the Old covenant, so you could not care less if Christianity is subverted, since you already follow such a version now.

edit on 19-9-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)

If I had no use for the new covenant than I would not quote scripture from the new covenant. You are embarrassing yourself further.

I am now convinced that you are not the full quid.

reply to post by XplanetX

If I had no use for the new covenant than I would not quote scripture from the new covenant. You are embarrassing yourself further.

I am now convinced that you are not the full quid.

You do realize you just condemned yourself to Hell, right?
Now, on top of giving insults, you are playing semantics. As in New Testament is another way of saying the new covenant. Real cute but this will not impress God, in judgement.

Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by XplanetX

 

If I had no use for the new covenant than I would not quote scripture from the new covenant. You are embarrassing yourself further.

I am now convinced that you are not the full quid.

You do realize you just condemned yourself to Hell, right?
Now, on top of giving insults, you are playing semantics. As in New Testament is another way of saying the new covenant. Real cute but this will not impress God, in judgement.

reply to post by XplanetX


And whoever insults a brother will be brought before the council, and whoever says ‘Fool’ will be sent to fiery hell.

Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by XplanetX

 

And whoever insults a brother will be brought before the council, and whoever says ‘Fool’ will be sent to fiery hell.

Hmmmm.... I don't recall calling you a fool. To do so would credit you with a sane mind.

Quick question, why is it always "if you don't believe like me then you are going to hell?"

Originally posted by jmdewey60
My Bible says "Jesus", does yours ?
Do you watch movies or hear stories where demons are cast out in the name of Jesus?
Do you ever wonder if people who do not say or write, Jesus, but some Hebrew or Aramaic name instead, are demon possessed?

Hello...would just like to point out that movies are fictional and stories are not always factual. Just saying, don't mean to doubt you.

To my understanding regarding possessions, it is not necessarily based on the language of which you incite/pray from a holy book, but rather from your understanding as well as the strong faith you have towards it when you incite it.

Peace

Originally posted by rcanem
Quick question, why is it always "if you don't believe like me then you are going to hell?"

Hopefully, the word, Jesus, in the thread title is an indication that the topic is something to do with Christian theology, so when you get into that, there is this implied fact that there is a judgement that takes place and some get through well and some don't. The gauge for judgement has to do with belief. Such as, according to the normal definitions, if one did not believe there was a judgement, they may lead a life of doing things for themselves at the expense of others. Then, that person comes unprepared for judgement, to their loss.

There are many camps with regards to the true name of Christ. After many years of rigorous study on the subject, it seems that gods chosen name for his son was Edna.
In the same context Hitler had a traumatic childhood when his Peers would constantly refer to him as Adolph! when we of course know through the window of time that "Adolph Hitler" was actually christened "Naughty Michael".

Originally posted by Madhouse

Originally posted by jmdewey60
My Bible says "Jesus", does yours ?
Do you watch movies or hear stories where demons are cast out in the name of Jesus?
Do you ever wonder if people who do not say or write, Jesus, but some Hebrew or Aramaic name instead, are demon possessed?

Hello...would just like to point out that movies are fictional and stories are not always factual. Just saying, don't mean to doubt you.

To my understanding regarding possessions, it is not necessarily based on the language of which you incite/pray from a holy book, but rather from your understanding as well as the strong faith you have towards it when you incite it.

Peace

So, according to your understanding it would not matter if you prayed to Satan or Jesus and the actual entity is of no significance, just any book and any god? That would be one way to do things but not according to the Christian religion.

reply to post by Madhouse

You have some good points and I think may be valid in regards to demons.
Movies and stories are not very good sources for information on demons.
I just get demon vibes from people who get into these names that they use as magic.
I think of Moses as a sorcerer and that he conjured demons of the desert to kill his enemies.