It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Human_Alien
No. I forgot today was Friday.
I don't understand how you can think that the lights videoed in Texas are connected to the meteor and other unrelated videos, none of which bear any resemblance to each other.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
The video is probably not a hoax.
The presentation of it may be false, or a hoax.
But the video itself appears rather authentic for the most part.
If I gave you a video of rain, and said "Lava pours from the sky", and you saw a video of rain water, you would call me a hoaxer for claiming it was lava. However the video itself of rain water, is authentic and not faked at all.
Differentiating between the two is always a good maneuver.
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
This is getting ridiculous...
Any other day you would be crying about the media being part of the "cover up" and not trusting them... but not today... not when they confirm your religious like beliefs. When they confirm your beliefs you take every word from the media as gospel.
Hypocrites!!
Originally posted by apusnuthook
Just wanted to throw that in, could it have been a failed unannounced shuttle start?
Would explain 2 events and shuttle video.
The 'meteor' coming down were the remains of the shuttle...
Originally posted by muzzleflash
No I don't think so. You speak in absolutes, I speak in probabilities typically. Saying things like "maybe" "possibly" "could be" "might be" are the safest way to communicate usually.
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Also, did you prove the video in the OP was a shuttle launch? No? Just because they look similar doesn't automatically mean it is. If it is indeed a specific shuttle launch, supply DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE of it or else I will merely laugh at your asinine absolutist assumptions.
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
Ok, I found a better comparison video.
This is PROOF that the OP's video is the Space Shuttle Endeavor STS-130 taking off on Feb. 7, 2010.
Here is the source video:
www.youtube.com...
The OP's video lied about it being a UFO. They lied about the location. They lied about the date. It is complete deception. It is a HOAX.
HOAX DESTROYED
edit on 16-9-2011 by gift0fpr0phecy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SheopleNation
The puppet masters are testing their projected laser beams all over the place. You know something is wrong when the mass media is reporting on it. We have now entered the infant stages of the last card. ~SheopleNationedit on 16-9-2011 by SheopleNation because: TypO
Originally posted by captainnotsoobvious
reply to post by Human_Alien
How the heck did this sillyness end up on the front page of ATS...
hmmmmmmmmm
Originally posted by muzzleflash
reply to post by gift0fpr0phecy
Comparison videos are not proof. They are mere comparisons, and tenuous ones at best.
It's a video of a dot of white light over a black backdrop, that's not enough information to go with sorry.
Have you supplied any Documentation proving this video is indeed a specific shuttle launch? I want documentation, not a "comparison video" which you feel super-sure about. I am not so sure, and with documentation which correlates the two than I will accept your explanation.
It's real simple. Provide actual proof.
Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
reply to post by muzzleflash
I had 100% proof that the OP's video is the shuttle all this time. Of course I was speaking in absolutes! That is like mocking someone for speaking in absolutes when they say 1+1=2!
Originally posted by Human_Alien
Originally posted by muzzleflash
reply to post by gift0fpr0phecy
Comparison videos are not proof. They are mere comparisons, and tenuous ones at best.
It's a video of a dot of white light over a black backdrop, that's not enough information to go with sorry.
Have you supplied any Documentation proving this video is indeed a specific shuttle launch? I want documentation, not a "comparison video" which you feel super-sure about. I am not so sure, and with documentation which correlates the two than I will accept your explanation.
It's real simple. Provide actual proof.
If 7-billion of us looked at one ink-blot test I guarantee there will be at least 1 billion different opinions.
Hey I think Obama looks exactly like Osama. Guess there's a cut-off point for comparison, huh?