It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Seems you calculate every word to turn a certain direction. People are not saved by loving God.
The NT talks about an administration of a covenant.
A covenant of angels.
It never makes claims about God's involvement.
If I am wrong about that, then be sure to point out my error but all you have is a philosophy of ignoring the spiritual and clinging to the physical so your life will cease to exist when your physical body ceases to exist.
You do not offer salvation but only slavery.
This has nothing to do with angels.
There are some people who will rule, as in sitting on thrones but they are a special group who were killed as martyrs for Christ. They may only rule as much as to be witnesses to judgement when everyone else has their names come up. You can't have every single Christian rule, otherwise who would they rule over? If you say, "the nations", then that is wrong because the Christians are the people of the nations. To me, you are just making happy talk to get people who have a desire for power to accept your philosophy. That is not to say that there will not be a select group who make it through the final tribulation who will be especially recognized.
After salvation, we will be lifted up with Christ and made to rule at His side.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by SuperiorEd
I was brought up in a church which is heavily into the Old Testament.
You may have heard of it, Seventh Day Adventist.
So you can't lecture me on the OT.
Really seriously heavily into it from birth.
So you have zero chance of converting me into something that took me 57 years to get out of.
I am just sticking to scripture and what it is saying. The Bible is unified form cover to cover.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by SuperiorEd
Back to your post:
Just a bunch of philosophizing.
And so what, whatever pictographs mean.
You seem to live in an esoteric world where you are picking out little numeric codes as if this is a puzzle God made.
This is the sort of thing Jesus probably meant in John 3, when he spoke about earthly things.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by SuperiorEd
I am just sticking to scripture and what it is saying. The Bible is unified form cover to cover.
You don't make that point.
You go on about church and theology being ego, while you are busy making up your own church and theology.
So how is that not being proud?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by SuperiorEd
I don't really care for you philosophy because almost every word you say is wrong.
There is no useful information in it at all.
You are some sort of person with a fixation on Judaism so nothing you say is relevant.
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by SuperiorEd
I don't really care for you philosophy because almost every word you say is wrong.
There is no useful information in it at all.
How so. Provide context. I have not said anything that is not backed by a scripture.
Perceived truth that is in error will always go against the mind and the heart to cause cognitive dissonance. Truth agrees with both the mind and the heart. For this to work, the heart needs to be as clean as possible. Pride needs to be removed and replaced with the wisdom of God by the leading of the spirit. As much as possible, this is always my aim.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
You are some sort of person with a fixation on Judaism so nothing you say is relevant.
Originally posted by SuperiorEd
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by SuperiorEd
I don't really care for you philosophy because almost every word you say is wrong.
There is no useful information in it at all.
How so. Provide context. I have not said anything that is not backed by a scripture.
You throw in the name, Jesus, but misapplied and not according to the Bible.
It's your interpretation of this idealized culture that you worship.
That is completely meaningless to me.
You apparently believe that God is going to recreate this world you imagine so you are busy preparing a user's manual for life as servants to the Jews.
I don't believe in your religion of racial superiority for a mythical bloodline, who we have to submit to.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by SuperiorEd
Perceived truth that is in error will always go against the mind and the heart to cause cognitive dissonance. Truth agrees with both the mind and the heart. For this to work, the heart needs to be as clean as possible. Pride needs to be removed and replaced with the wisdom of God by the leading of the spirit. As much as possible, this is always my aim.
You're just spouting psychobabble that doesn't mean anything.
I don't know what truth you think you have.
I read the Bible and I point out what it says because a lot of people don't know what it says, so they are vulnerable to the cultists who are constantly on this forum promoting their cult religion. You are one of them but an offshoot from the main cult but ultimately you have the same goal, which is to hijack Jesus to promote some brand of slavery to an Old Testament God, the same god who Jesus came to free us from.
I suppose you have a pictograph to demonstrate that it is really the angel of Sinai.
From your perspective, who is the Father that Jesus is referring to here?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by SuperiorEd
I suppose you have a pictograph to demonstrate that it is really the angel of Sinai.
From your perspective, who is the Father that Jesus is referring to here?
I would say, not Yahweh.
That's just a name and to me, not even a name but a way of not giving a name.
That was an angel who said he appeared previously to other people, as one thing or another, which were probably the commonly used name to mean god, at that time.
For all I know, Yahweh was him saying, "in the past I showed up representing God, but now I am representing myself, who I am."
So he was an angel who was used to talking and looking like God, so he just went ahead and acted out the part.
Anyway, the Father in the quote you gave would be the real God who no one has seen, who is spirit and lives in impenetrable light.
edit on 3-9-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by SuperiorEd
I already told you that your psychobabble is worthless.
I am going in the opposite direction from you.
I started out where you are now and have broken free from the Bronze Age concept of a tribal god.
I told you that when you first posted on this sub-forum.
ETA: I keep hearing this bit about pride and you are a long ways off in your analysis.
It is righteous indignation as I am looking at the works of the minions of Satan trying to lead people into bondage.
edit on 4-9-2011 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)