It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BoneMosaic
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
He shot the man and tried to cover it up, now he will pay for his crimes. Good riddance. His family should lose all social security payments as well should they be getting any.edit on 19-8-2011 by Brokenbackrest because: (no reason given)
You fail so much...
Paul Henry Gingerich is serving a prison sentence for the shooting that killed a friend’s step-father. Even though he didn’t pull the trigger — or know that he was going to be a part of the murder plot — Gingerich was sentenced to 30 years in jail.
Can't you read?
Even if he had pulled the triigger, the kid is freaking 12. He should go in jail for the rest of his life... he should be in counseling/rehabilitation... mental facility...
The kid is 12, you can still put him on the right track.
No, YOU fail so much, by falling for this little cretin's family propaganda. Of course they are going to say that he is innocent, never pulled the trigger, but the fact is, he is a little psychopath who needs to be kept locked up.
Until there is hard evidence that he was involved in pre-meditated murder you can't make that judgement.
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Wheras in European countries, especially Nordic Countries it is based more on Rehabilitation
Which is why we get things like the Norway shootings. Crime is crime, and a punishment must be harsh no matter how old the person is.
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Wheras in European countries, especially Nordic Countries it is based more on Rehabilitation
Which is why we get things like the Norway shootings. Crime is crime, and a punishment must be harsh no matter how old the person is.
seriously?
ignorant much?
since the USA's system is working so perfectly, care to explain:
- columbine killings
- unabomber killings
- tucson shooting
etc?
He shot the man and tried to cover it up, now he will pay for his crimes. Good riddance. His family should lose all social security payments as well should they be getting any.
Guilty and no doubt fully involved in the planning. Hopefully when he gets to 18 they can retrial him and sentence him to death.
Which is why we get things like the Norway shootings. Crime is crime, and a punishment must be harsh no matter how old the person is.
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Wheras in European countries, especially Nordic Countries it is based more on Rehabilitation
Which is why we get things like the Norway shootings. Crime is crime, and a punishment must be harsh no matter how old the person is.
seriously?
ignorant much?
since the USA's system is working so perfectly, care to explain:
- columbine killings
- unabomber killings
- tucson shooting
etc?
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Wheras in European countries, especially Nordic Countries it is based more on Rehabilitation
Which is why we get things like the Norway shootings. Crime is crime, and a punishment must be harsh no matter how old the person is.
seriously?
ignorant much?
since the USA's system is working so perfectly, care to explain:
- columbine killings
- unabomber killings
- tucson shooting
etc?
You forgot Oaklahoma.
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
i just needed to say this.
you're talking about harsh punishments, do you consider solitary confinment a 'harsh' punishment?
please answer this question because then i know you're way of thinking.
i say solitary confinement as a legalized form of torture.
edit on 19-8-2011 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Wheras in European countries, especially Nordic Countries it is based more on Rehabilitation
Which is why we get things like the Norway shootings. Crime is crime, and a punishment must be harsh no matter how old the person is.
seriously?
ignorant much?
since the USA's system is working so perfectly, care to explain:
- columbine killings
- unabomber killings
- tucson shooting
etc?
I don't know, since I don't live under the US legal system. I do know, that in Singapore where the cane is given for young offenders, Juvenile Crime rates are some of the lowest on earth. So, harsh penalties work. Deal with it.
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
i just needed to say this.
you're talking about harsh punishments, do you consider solitary confinment a 'harsh' punishment?
please answer this question because then i know you're way of thinking.
i say solitary confinement as a legalized form of torture.
edit on 19-8-2011 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)
Not really, as prisoners are provided with food, water, heat, a bed, clothes, showers, a private toilet etc.
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
i just needed to say this.
you're talking about harsh punishments, do you consider solitary confinment a 'harsh' punishment?
please answer this question because then i know you're way of thinking.
i say solitary confinement as a legalized form of torture.
edit on 19-8-2011 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)
Not really, as prisoners are provided with food, water, heat, a bed, clothes, showers, a private toilet etc.
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by Brokenbackrest
Originally posted by kn0wh0w
i just needed to say this.
you're talking about harsh punishments, do you consider solitary confinment a 'harsh' punishment?
please answer this question because then i know you're way of thinking.
i say solitary confinement as a legalized form of torture.
edit on 19-8-2011 by kn0wh0w because: (no reason given)
Not really, as prisoners are provided with food, water, heat, a bed, clothes, showers, a private toilet etc.
Remember the UK got done in the European Courts for using the stress positions on prisoners. That is against the law. It is considered a cruel punishment.
Britain is a heavy user of the stress position, as is America I am sure during detentions.
Originally posted by Flavian
reply to post by JennaDarling
Im sorry, i often like your posts but have to strongly disagree with at least one statement here - Britain being one of the most unsafe places to live in the world? What are you talking about? Britain has low crime levels, low violent crime levels, etc etc. I would much rather live here than in many many parts of the world. Ok i accept that there is gun crime, but it is of such a low level numbers wise not to concern ourselves about.
I genuinely believe that most of our problems these days are down to the media and rolling / constant news - we are always on the look out for the next issue to discuss to death and raise fear levels, sorry raise ratings This can applied to any of the issues occurring. Take us ATS'ers for example. We are all clearly the type of person interested by the world around us and discussing this interest with others. Every day there are many many topics to discuss and every day the world goes on............probably a lesson there somewhere! Look at the financial crisis - we have now had 2 years of bad news on a daily basis about economics - is it any suprise that there is such market volatility? Repeat something enough and it takes on a life of its own, becomes a self fulfilling prophecy.
Look at the riots - looting is bad but the way it has been portrayed in the media, you could be forgiven for thinking that we have never experienced this kind of thing before. Hell, go back to the 1920's and Winston wanted to get the tanks on the street to get rid of rioters! (have actually seen a very cool old black and white film of then First Lord of the Admiralty Churchill aiming his pistol at rioters in London).
The point im trying (unsuccessfully) to make is that the UK is very safe compared to just about any other part of the world. But if you read the Daily Mail or get constant rolling news you are never going to believe that because it is shoved down your throat just how terrible our society and world is