It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
Also still waiting on that proof that this has anything to do with separation of church and state.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Annee
No that is misguided thought. Separation of church and state is there to keep the church from running the government THAT'S IT. It doesn't mean the government has a restraining order against the church.
Be liberal all you want, just don't be unreasonable.
I am fully aware of what Separation of Church and State is. I've been debating it for about 20 years.
Atheists are right to call attention to and file suit in any questionable violation - related to Separation of Church and State.
If government funding is being used to put up a cross that clearly represents Christianity - - - the Atheists are correct in making a case.
This is fact based. It has nothing to do with political thinking - - Atheists are both Conservative and Liberal. I personally am Social Liberal - Fiscal Conservative.
Originally posted by DrChuck
If I recall correctly your all about equality...Separation of church and state would mean that only atheism is represented by the government.
All your capitol buildings, court buildings are atheistic, it represents no religion. So wheres our equally represented Christian, or Jewish government building?
Originally posted by DrChuck
reply to post by Annee
Whether its a lack of belief or a belief that a God is nonexistent, its beside the point. Atheists just as Christians are a demographic group of people. Separation of Church and State only allows the representation of Atheism by the government.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Annee
Thanks. Though the numbers they are putting out are funding not really the cross (which is just part of the memorial) but also the museum. It will probably make more money than will have been spent on it.
Originally posted by snarfbot
first, i dont think atheists have any business objecting to anything involving religious observance.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by DrChuck
reply to post by Annee
Whether its a lack of belief or a belief that a God is nonexistent, its beside the point. Atheists just as Christians are a demographic group of people. Separation of Church and State only allows the representation of Atheism by the government.
Whether god exists or not is beside the point.
The American government was designed to be secular. Laws are non-partisan - - they apply to all.
How are Atheists a demographic group? They are not a group at all really - - other then a need to organize to keep America secular.
No one is stopping anyone from practicing their belief. Government protects that also.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by snarfbot
first, i dont think atheists have any business objecting to anything involving religious observance.
Yes - they do.
If it is on government property or government funds are being used.
Originally posted by DrChuck
What do you mean how are atheists a demographic group? They are the group of people in the US that do not believe in a God. Is that not a group of people that share the same beliefs? Can they not be set apart as a group in a population concerning religions? Do you know what demographics mean?
It's a sad little club that would make things come to this. Somehow the religious have not only become the majority and sequestered the power, they make religion a requirement and a guidepost.
Originally posted by DrChuck Torcaso v. Watkins.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Generally, common sense prevails.. anyways..
1% were Muslim.
15% were Jewish
Approx 80% Christian (most being Catholic)
majorityrights.com...
islam.about.com...
www.philaahzophy.com...
en.wikipedia.org...
Among items being put in the Museum are a Bible with a piece of steel embedded in it. A Jewish shawl. The Cross was the only thing being objected to. Because it's a "symbol", even if it is also history.
In short.. Progressive Political Correctness gone wild.
For the exact opposite the reasons I just stated? Just as any real religion would care.. but Atheist believe in nothing, so it shouldn't matter. Removing religious symbolism is a violation of the 1st amendment. Atheism, not being a religion, should not be able to trump other religions just because an extreme minority are "offended".
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by Kitilani
Actually, their suit says to represent all, or take them all down.
I can easily agree with representing all. No issue.
My issue is with taking them all down.