It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bobdigi
That was my first reaction...who gives the U.S. the right to question the military goals of any other country...and honestly that extends to nuclear weapons. If we can have them, so can any other country. I think the prevailing opinion among the powers that be is that we are the "good guys". Not that we aren't, in some sense, but the fact of the matter is, we do not, or should not, have the authority to police the world. We can have intel on other countries, but cannot dictate what they do with their military.
Again, it's because we've never hidden what we were building, save for concept and research aircraft.
but after that they would be sunk
I think you forget the fact that many of the conflicts the United States of America enters are because they are asked to do so on behalf of your "peaceful" European nations.
Originally posted by OrionsRage
For America to be the only nation in the history of human beings that have actually dropped multiple nukes on innocent civilians, not too long ago. They sure seem to be in a dillusional state of mind to be asking anyone about anything concerning military equipment.
Originally posted by ateuprto
Originally posted by Jay-morris
Originally posted by ateuprto
reply to post by JennaDarling
My first question would be what country you reside in?
We ARE a peaceful nation, and despite your simplistic point of view, the rest of the "Western" world is just as dirty as we are. I think you forget the fact that many of the conflicts the United States of America enters are because they are asked to do so on behalf of your "peaceful" European nations. The "War on Terror" is a different story, however it is one that is much, MUCH more complex than a simple act of unwarranted aggression.edit on 11-8-2011 by ateuprto because: (no reason given)
There was nothing peaceful happening when they illegally invaded iraq. Im not suprised that countries are going hardcore with there militery. Maybe its because they don't know who America will invade next, could very well be them!
That is fear-mongering nonsense not based in reality. We are not there for resources. We are not there because we hate Islam. The invasion of Iraq was not a wise choice, that coming from a man who has been deployed there. It was a short-sighted, reactionary decision made on non-existent and/or false intelligence. That is not to say that Saddam Hussein's regime was innocent of harboring individuals and organizations with the intentions of attacking the United States of America, because I assure you, he was. Had I been commander-in-chief we would have not started that campaign, though I am much more familiar with tribal, social and religious relations in the region. A strong-handed, brutal dictator has been necessary in many Arab nations. They are the only ones ruthless enough to control the widespread intercultural and inter-religious conflicts that exist there.
The United States of America is guilty of making poor decisions in the immediate aftermath of the 2001 attacks. I have no qualms with conceding to that. It is my (our) responsibility. I can assure you, however, that most of the scum we are currently engaged with in Afghanistan and Iraq today are horrible human beings. They slaughter men, women and children knowingly and intentionally. Not in isolated cases of insanity, but as widespread and accepted doctrine. Their perspectives are so warped and ingrained that it would scare you. I have no problems with our killing these jerk-offs, but I have also seen what they are capable of first-hand.
The point is that we are not some insane war-machine, wantonly attacking whoever we deem unworthy. There are plenty of nations we have had issues with for decades that we have not engaged militarily. That is because they have not presented a threat to our nation militarily. When men are willing and able to inflict mass civilian casualties on our own soil and abroad, do you expect us to sit back and wait for the next attack? How does one guarantee safety without proactively hunting down and engaging those who intend to kill as many of our countrymen and women as possible? How does one guarantee safety without actively engaging and tracking those who have every intention and all the funding necessary to procure a nuclear weapon? They are not seeking nuclear weapons as a means of mutually assured destruction, I.E. Defense. They are seeking these weapons with no other intent than to detonate them on Western European and U.S. American soil.
I can agree that our preemptive doctrine with regards to military force is seemingly unnecessary and in many cases backfires, but it is a necessity in this day and age. We, among other nations, have learned our lessons the hard way. There is simply no way to guarantee "homeland security" from the homeland anymore. EVERY CIVILIZED NATION participates in global intelligence gathering and preemptive military actions. I will give you $1000 if you can give me a nation who does not.
Saw you are from the UK, do you find your own nation exempt from any of this? If so, take me to fairytale land with you.edit on 11-8-2011 by ateuprto because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
America happens to be a democracy and a beacon of freedom and justice... therefore it gets to keep its war machines.
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by Darkblade71
I can understand the US Gov. asking why,
I don't think anyone said "You can't have this"
China is quickly becoming a super-power, They are not there yet, but they will be.
Once the USA deems them as a credible threat, we will enter another cold war.
Although really, a cold war is already going on if you ask me, which you didn't.
The one thing I DO like about China is the fact that on the global scene, they seem to use a lot of common sense, I'm glad someone does.
You want a cold war with the very people that companies are running to and you are buying all your stuff from?
That would not be a wise move, if you have a cold war with China you will go to hell in a hand basket very very quickly.
Originally posted by Darkblade71
Originally posted by JennaDarling
Originally posted by Darkblade71
I can understand the US Gov. asking why,
I don't think anyone said "You can't have this"
China is quickly becoming a super-power, They are not there yet, but they will be.
Once the USA deems them as a credible threat, we will enter another cold war.
Although really, a cold war is already going on if you ask me, which you didn't.
The one thing I DO like about China is the fact that on the global scene, they seem to use a lot of common sense, I'm glad someone does.
You want a cold war with the very people that companies are running to and you are buying all your stuff from?
That would not be a wise move, if you have a cold war with China you will go to hell in a hand basket very very quickly.
I don't want a war with anyone, just saying that is what I see happening.
Personally, I think we should completely stop trade with China and go back to Made in the USA, because China is killing us already with cheap products that could very well be made here, although not as cheaply. If I was able to, I would completely boycott Wal-mart, and all Chinese made products, unfortunately, I cannot.