It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
All of the places that have legalized have seen a declining social quality and increasing crime rate.
Prohibition, as we learned with alcohol in the 1920s, not only does not work, but gives rise to staggering rates of death, disease, crime and addiction. In fact, it guarantees them.
Originally posted by Fiberx
My bet is that most pot smokers will quit eventually and realize that it wasn't a net positive in their lives. They will not always regret it, most will laugh about the adventures they had. Almost all will, however, realize that they wouldn't recommend it as a healthy, positive path to take in life.
However, the problem is that people are being locked in metal boxes...
Originally posted by Fiberx
btw, If alcohol hadn't been a part of our culture for thousands of years you couldn't make a rational arguement to legalize it now either.
It's called wisdom and is gained through experience. We do things that work, or don't work and pass on the good stuff while attempting to discourage the things which turn out to be pointless or destructive in the larger scheme.
I couldn't make a rational argument for my freedom to have and consume alcohol?
The idea that I have to justify my own recreational drug use to another person is insane to me...
Originally posted by Fiberx
It's a bs excuse to compare my bodies endorphines to inhaling heated chemicals from a plant.. I rarely drink and moved beyond getting drunk at 22 (same deal, just act like a fool when you get drunk). I have never needed the god crutch but fantasies about an omnipotent being making sure everything is ok for you aren't all that different than hiding behind a drug high, so you might have an angle there.
Originally posted by Fiberx
btw, If alcohol hadn't been a part of our culture for thousands of years you couldn't make a rational arguement to legalize it now either.
Originally posted by Fiberx
My bet is that most pot smokers will quit eventually and realize that it wasn't a net positive in their lives.
Originally posted by Fiberx
They will not always regret it, most will laugh about the adventures they had. Almost all will, however, realize that they wouldn't recommend it as a healthy, positive path to take in life. You won't be pushing your kids to smoke dope if you have any sense.
Originally posted by Fiberx
It's called wisdom and is gained through experience. We do things that work, or don't work and pass on the good stuff while attempting to discourage the things which turn out to be pointless or destructive in the larger scheme.
Just days after the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) insisted that there is no medical value to marijuana, the White House appeared to contradict the position, saying in a report that there may actually be "some" medical value to "individual components of the cannabis plant" after all.
activistpost
Originally posted by Icarus Rising
There must be some ulterior motive for them to maintain this stance. There may be many.
In a study, researchers have found that long-term pot smokers were roughly 62 percent less likely to develop head and neck cancers than people who did not smoke pot....
Compared to people who never smoked pot, those who began smoking marijuana between the ages of 15 and 19 years were 47 percent less likely to develop head and neck cancer, while users who began at age 20 or older had a 61 percent reduced risk, Kelsey and colleagues found.
Continue reading at NowPublic.com: Smoking pot reduces cancer risk, study? | NowPublic News Coverage www.nowpublic.com...
Originally posted by djzombie
However, the problem is that people are being locked in metal boxes...
Locked in metal boxes for profit, at every turn, at the expense of the american tax payer, who clearly does not want this.
The government is only concerned with interests of those who line their pockets, and those interests are generally in direct conflict with the needs and wants of the people, seemingly by design.
Originally posted by DrinkYourDrug
reply to post by Jezus
I couldn't make a rational argument for my freedom to have and consume alcohol?
The idea that I have to justify my own recreational drug use to another person is insane to me...
Silly rational thinkers.. When will you accept that it is moral for the irrational amongst us to use violence to dictate our ideal lifestyle and protect us from ourselves?
Originally posted by pikypiky
Look at how potheads handle themselves: they seem sluggish and don't look all that alert/responsive or giggle too much for their own good. So right there, something is wrong when pot is used.