Some hard numbers about the Vax and the effort to cover up said numbers

originally posted by: Disgusted123
I guess the fact that 99.9% of the people who got vaccinated are still alive and doing well is kinda putting this rhetoric to bed, isn't it?

How many more years are we going to try this gaslighting?

a reply to: andy06shake

so what you're admitting to is that it wasn't 100% safe and effective like they told everyone.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: BigDuckEnergy


When a freedom of information request is given to the CDC on the results of their study on myocarditis, and all you get is a hundred and forty pages all totally redacted pages you know something is up.

That wasn't a study. Why are you calling it a study?

Fact Check: CDC Supposedly Released Redacted Study on Myocarditis After COVID-19 Vaccination. Here's What We Know

As we will demonstrate below, the redacted document was not in any sense a "study."

a reply to: Arbitrageur

I will go with O Looney on this one, the more people die the more they will want the numbers hidden, they are not building prisons because they want to,its all a plan unfolding steadily most of the working class has found themselves redundant through no fault of their own.What does a government do, feed increasing numbers , or get rid of the problem? rumble.com...

a reply to: annonentity
That doesn't answer my question about why you called it a study when it wasn't a study.

a reply to: Arbitrageur

It isn't a secret that people are dying of myocarditis from the jab, it is just the number of which is the real discussion. Semantics don't alter the fact. It is obvious that the CDC are playing for time, while they try to spin some numbers, the FOI request was precise ,and they gave nothing.

originally posted by: annonentity
a reply to: Arbitrageur

It isn't a secret that people are dying of myocarditis from the jab, it is just the number of which is the real discussion.

I've seen that claim, it may be true in some cases.

Semantics don't alter the fact.

Right, but semantics does make you calling something a study that's not a study, a lie.

It is obvious that the CDC are playing for time, while they try to spin some numbers, the FOI request was precise ,and they gave nothing.

Maybe they are hiding something, like confidential communications, some of which may even be talking about problems related to the jab. But the redacted document was still not a study, and you calling it a study makes you a liar if you know it's not a study.

Can't wait until the next disease X, to see how many sheeple volunteer for the vaccine. . .

We don't need vaccines, it's not natural and is a scam by the eugenics cult of today.

Population control, means we are the carbon they want to reduce.

Search eugenics and see for yourself.

Don't take any one's word for it, verify then trust.