Originally posted by Kitilani
reply to post by Mr Mask
I gave you the links.
No you did not. You explained the Whitehouse has enhanced and optimized the doc and failed to notice that that is basically saying the doc was
What you failed to notice in your lack of understanding on the technical side of the argument is this-
Optimizing or enhancing any image in Illustrator, you will not get a link history showing images entered the file from another source, "on their
side" and with a history showing that sizes were altered.
That will not happen with an image scan...OCR or not...PDF or not.
I can not claim to be an expert but I can say I've used these programs to produce tens of thousands of scans and images for many many years. Hell,
one of my little 2 minute cartoons contain over 5 thousand enhanced/optimized images alone...and that is just a little cartoon.
You have no idea what the argument even is...never mind the fact that you don't know anything about image editing or Adobe products.
In less words- you are parroting crap from sources you blindly trust and not speaking from a "know" stance.
You said you did not want to read them. So just because you are too afraid of the mean threads and angry people to read, I am not going to hold your
hand and walk you through what you are missing.
I'm not afraid...I'm sick of people like you intentionally disrupting intelligent debate with slander and insults. You have called me retarded
twice, and said worse about others. I search for the answer in far more "polite and informative" forums where people like you would be laughed at
and ignored based on your lack of understanding of the issue.
In my own opinion- you having anything to say about this is on par with a caveman trying to tell a scientist about electricity.
You fail to even understand cut-n-paste basics.
What you call ignorance is actually just not wasting my time telling you things you could read for yourself but do not want to.
I've read hundreds of posts on Adobe forums and similar graphic editing sites where people who know what they are saying have things to say. Like I
said, if I want to hear a lady who don't know jack about Illustrator trying to skirt around the fact, I'll come look you up.
But for now, I rather listen to people with at least "some understanding" of the argument.
I gave links to two other threads that cover every inch of this. Aptness has covered every inch of this. You are just arguing with me about stupid
things like whether or not I would label you a racist because birthers only know how to swat at low hanging fruit.
Look lady...you have stated that the explanation is "The Whitehouse admitted to altering the doc". and that not understanding that THAT answers it
all, shows some lack of logic.
I've tried to explain to you that there is a blatant link history that shows MORE then optimizing and enhancing, it shows a total history of adding
and resizing images.
But you think you answered that already...weird.
It is not that I do not like you enough to hold your hand and spoon feed you,
You can hardly hold a conversation without changing the subject or jumping to insults over fact. I wouldn't let you touch my hand based on that
Honestly you have no idea about image editing. I know enough to ask questions and will accept an answer when one is presented. So far I've seen
nontechnical crap-talk laced with hate and slander.
The answer should come very easy to anyone who has one based on the functions of Illustrator. The guy who taught me Illustrator (an expert as far as
I'm concerned) agrees there is problems here.
But a lady who knows zero about Adobe products tells me I'm wrong for wanting an answer...and then she tells me she gave me an answer...you did not.
You said the silliest thing I could have ever heard.
"The doc wasn't altered, it was just enhanced and optimized."
I guess you don't even know the meaning of those words along with not knowing Illustrator.
It is that this thread has been done before. All this exact same stuff has been gone over at least twice.
Again you fail to make sense. This thread is about Mara Zebest coming forward after her speech at the National Press Club speaking on behalf of what
she knows. You are just one of the typical "new members" trying to change the subject and confuse the issue with slander and accusations of racism
and birther nonsense.
This has not been covered before...Mara Zebest is a new part to this story and is now being covered for the first time in this thread.
Please stop derailing it with crap that is not related or an entirely different subject.
All the relevant links are there. You have not asked one question that goes unanswered.
I clicked your links and saw more of the same... barbaric arguments from a stance of people who don't know anything about photo editing. I'm sure
there may be some sort of info in there worth reading, but just like here- alls I can see are insults, slander and subject changing.
Sit here and bicker with me though. In the meantime, Obama is running for office again. Hear about that?
I voted for the guy. And will probably do the same next time as well.
So...are you done proving you know nothing and are basically a parrot?